Difference between revisions of "Talk:Moderate Party"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I would recommend clarifying the name of this article as well: "Moderate Party (Sober Thought)"? ~ ''[[User:Ceorana|Ceo]]|[[User talk:Ceorana|<small>squawk</small>]]'' 00:24, November 24, 2005 (GMT) | I would recommend clarifying the name of this article as well: "Moderate Party (Sober Thought)"? ~ ''[[User:Ceorana|Ceo]]|[[User talk:Ceorana|<small>squawk</small>]]'' 00:24, November 24, 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Aha! I was just proposing the same thing to [[Pacitalia]], inside a more generalised discussion. I think [[Conservative Party]] and [[Socialist Party]] are definitely due for one main disambig entry which does not lead to '''any'' of its possible meanings. I had thought the [[Moderate Party]] and [[Free Enterprise Party]] were pretty safe, but with your comment, I guess they deserve the same treatment. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::So I think I'll go broaden my horizons and expand my mind by learning how to create dead-end disambigs for these four. While I'm at it, although I don't have a Libertarian Party (the FEP is that effectively and uses "Libertarians" as a nickname) myself, I'll make one for it too. Any other candidates? My RP parliament has 8 parties, the remainder of which I thought were pretty safe as direct entries, perhaps the [[Christian Unity Party]] having some similarly (but not, I suspect) identically named cousins in the NS world. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Current (slightly refined) state of the art for my suggestions on rearranging articles in Category:Sober Thought are found on my own User:talk pages with Pacit. Disagreements, suggestions? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Thanks a load for your kind assistance and helpful suggestions. Here, have a [[Denkmark]]; you might run out of toilet paper someday! | ||
Latest revision as of 20:32, 23 November 2005
I would recommend clarifying the name of this article as well: "Moderate Party (Sober Thought)"? ~ Ceo|squawk 00:24, November 24, 2005 (GMT)
- Aha! I was just proposing the same thing to Pacitalia, inside a more generalised discussion. I think Conservative Party and Socialist Party are definitely due for one main disambig entry which does not lead to 'any of its possible meanings. I had thought the Moderate Party and Free Enterprise Party were pretty safe, but with your comment, I guess they deserve the same treatment.
- So I think I'll go broaden my horizons and expand my mind by learning how to create dead-end disambigs for these four. While I'm at it, although I don't have a Libertarian Party (the FEP is that effectively and uses "Libertarians" as a nickname) myself, I'll make one for it too. Any other candidates? My RP parliament has 8 parties, the remainder of which I thought were pretty safe as direct entries, perhaps the Christian Unity Party having some similarly (but not, I suspect) identically named cousins in the NS world.
- Current (slightly refined) state of the art for my suggestions on rearranging articles in Category:Sober Thought are found on my own User:talk pages with Pacit. Disagreements, suggestions?
- Thanks a load for your kind assistance and helpful suggestions. Here, have a Denkmark; you might run out of toilet paper someday!
