Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The article was deleted by 18 March 2005 on {{{2}}}, with consensus to delete achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. --Goobergunch|? 19:18, 22 Mar 2005 (GMT)

Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|? 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)

I highly doubt that we need a category for something that only has one entry. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 20:01, 20 Feb 2005 (GMT)

I concur. Rechze • (talk) 06:19, 22 Feb 2005 (GMT)

• Very weak keep. Now contains two articles. --Goobergunch|? 01:33, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
• Delete and change to something like geographical features. Rechze • (talk) 10:09, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
• Delete and recreate as Geography, then recategorize entries. → Fris Θtalk 23:37, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
• Sure. A geography category would be nice. ~ Nanakaland 19:33, 12 Mar 2005 (GMT)
• Delete and recreate as Geography seems like the best idea to me. Rivers is too specific. --Eddie 23:24, 18 Mar 2005 (GMT)
• Delete and recreate as Geography --Arturria 23:31, 18 Mar 2005 (GMT)

Category:Geography created, articles moved, Category:Rivers deleted. This page can be deleted shortly. → Fris Θtalk 23:45, 18 Mar 2005 (GMT)