Computer Users Fed Up With Heaps of Spam!

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Revision as of 01:15, 28 April 2007 by Mikitivity (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Issue #[1]
Computer Users Fed Up With Heaps of Spam!
Author Bored Yawning
Editor Sirocco
Date added
Subject internet
Main category (?) free speech
Number of options 3


Computer Users Fed Up With Heaps of Spam! is a national issue that deals with government restrictions on unsolicited emails (aka spam). This issue deals with the trade off between the economic drain spam represents with the loss of civil freedoms due to the restriction in sending the emails. It is assumed that nations have at least a modern level of technology, since this issue assumed nations have email and access to the Internet.

Issue

A survey citing a tremendous increase in unsolicited emails has added fire to the subject of what many view as a scourge of the Internet.

Debate options

  1. "The spam problem is out of control," states anti-spam advocate @@RANDOMNAME@@. "I get at least fifty spam e-mails a day. That isn't even counting the spam people are posting to my newsgroup and to my messageboard. This junk is a waste of time in that I have to delete it and a waste of my money in that I have to buy anti-spam programs-which hardly work anyway. People get swindled by this stuff - it should be a crime, just like regular fraud."
  2. "A ban on all spam is a restriction on our freedom of speech and on the freedom of the press!" screams @@RANDOMNAME@@ president of Citizens for Internet Freedom. "What is the government to say what is and isn't commercial spam? Could they haul charity representatives off to jail for seeking donations? Could they jail politicians for using e-mail to try and gain votes? Could they arrest me if I accidentally send my erotic novel-in-progress to the wrong address? Seriously, spamming is a subjective offense and as such should not be considered a crime."
  3. "Both sides are wrong," grumbles government paper-pusher @@RANDOMNAME@@. "Spam is definitely a problem, yet so is the restriction on freedoms which some draconian anti-spam codes would impose. I propose a ban on overtly fraudulent spam, and a tax on more legitimate businesses that rely on spam as an advertising method, and a strict legal definition of spam that would ensure no innocent person was prosecuted or taxed."

Domestic impacts

Option 1

The following game text is added to nations choosing this option:

?

It is believed that the first option significantly decreases Civil Freedoms.

Option 2

The following game text is added to nations choosing this option:

?

It is believed that the second option slightly increases Civil Freedoms.

Option 3

The following game text is added to nations choosing this option:

?

It is believed that the third option slightly decreases Civil Freedoms

United Nations impact

tba

Additional materials