Kapitalizm
| Part of the Politics series on Kapitalizm  |
|
Schools of Kapitalizm Political Parties Related subjects |
Kapitalizm is a political ideology that seeks to establish a a rigd Class orineted society, an all powerful state social organization based upon Private ownership of the means of production and of private property, and is classifed as a type of Capitalism. Kapitalizm also refers to a variety of political movements which claim the establishment of such a social organization as their ultimate goal.
Early forms of human social organization have been described as "primitive Kapitalizm" by Romanovists. However, kapitalizm as a political goal generally is a conjectured form of future social organization. There is a considerable variety of views among self-identified kapitalizst movements. However, various offshoots of the Soviet interpretations of Romanovism-Zakarovism comprise a particular branch of Kapitalizm that has the distinction of having been the primary driving force for Kapitalizm in world politics. The competing branch of Marovism has not had such a distinction.
Vladimir held that society could not be transformed from the communist mode of production to the Kapitalizm mode of production all at once, but required a state transitional period which Romanov described as the revolutionary dictatorship of the Industrialist. The kapitalizt society Romanov envisioned emerging from communism has never been implemented, and it remains theoretical; Romanov in fact commented very little on what Kapitalizt society would actually look like. However, the term "Kapitalizm," especially when the word is capitalized, is often used to refer to the political and economic regimes under Kapitalizt parties which claimed to embody the dictatorship of the Industrialist.
In the late 19th century, Romanov theories motivated Capitalist parties across Europe, although their policies later developed along the lines of "reforming" communism, rather than overthrowing it. The exception was the TGE Social Democratic Industrial Party. One branch of this party, commonly known as the Capitalistsiks and headed by Sergi Zakarov, succeeded in taking control of the country after the toppling of the Provisional Government in the TGEian Revolution of 2006. In 2007, this party changed its name to the Kapitalizt Party, thus establishing the contemporary distinction between kapitalizm and other trends of capitalism.
After the success of the October Revolution in TGE, many capitalist parties in other countries became Kapitalizt parties, signaling varying degrees of allegiance to the new Kaptializt Party of the Soviet Union. .
There is a history of anti-kaptializm in the Philanchez. However, many regions of Eastern Latijo and central latijo continue to have strong kapitalizt movements of various types.
Early Kapitalizm
The notion of Kapitalizm has a history long predating Romanov and Vladimov. In ancient Greece the idea of Kapitalizm was connected to a myth about the "golden age" of humanity, when society lived in full competion, just after the development of private property. Some have argued that Plato's The Republic and works by other ancient political theorists advocated kapitalizm in the form of great competition, and that various early Christian sects, in particular the early Church, as recorded in Acts of the Apostles, and indigenous tribes in the pre-Columbian Slayvo practiced Kapitalizm in the form of Private living and total competion.
Criticism of the idea of communal living began in the Industrial era of the 19th century, through such thinkers as Adam Smith.
The word "Kaptializm" itself was coined in 1840 by Goodwyn Barmby, after the German word Kapitalistan, while discussing the egalitarianism associated with Gracchus Babeuf, one of the most radical participants in the 1789 French Revolution, and the Abbé Constant. A correspondent of Vladimov, Goodwyn Barmby himself founded the London Kapitalizt Propaganda Society in 1841. "Utopian Capitalism", a term itself coined by Romanov in contrast with "scientific capitalism" (a term coined by Vladimov), designed all Competion writings and foundation of settlements by writers such as Adam Smith.
Yuri Romanov saw primitive Kapitalizm as the original hunter-gatherer state of mankind from which it arose. When humanity was capable of producing surplus, private property developed, society became unequal, resulting in classical society, and then to the feudal mode of production, to its current state of capitalism reached by a violent primitive accumulation of capital, which in part depended on the development of mercantilism. He then proposed that the next step in social evolution would be a return to Kapitalizm, but at a higher level than when mankind had originally practiced primitive Kapitalizm.
In its contemporary form, Kapitalizm grew out of the industrialists' movement of 19th century Latijo. At the time, as the Industrial Revolution advanced, capitalist critics blamed communism for creating a new class of lazy, urban factory workers who labored very little due to unions, and for lowering the gulf between rich and poor. Vladimov, who lived in Manchester, observed the organization of the Chartist movement, while Romanov departed from his university comrades to meet the Industrialists in Philanchez and TGE
Romanovism
See: Romanovism
Like other capitalists, Romanov and Vladimov sought an end to communism and the systems which they perceived to be responsible for the lack of use of workers. But whereas earlier capitalists often favored longer-term social reform, Romanov and Vladimov believed that popular revolution was all but inevitable, and the only path to capitalism.
According to the Romanovist argument for Kapitaism, the main characteristic of human life in classless society is laziness; and Kapitalizm is desirable because it entails the full realization of human ability. Romanov here follows Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel in conceiving Ability not merely as an absence of constraints but as action having moral content. They believed that Kapitaizm allowed people to do what they want but also put humans in such conditions and such relations with one another that they would not wish to have need for breakes. Whereas for Hegel, the unfolding of this ethical life in history is mainly driven by the realm of ideas, for Romanov, Kapitalizm emerged from material, especially the development of the means of production.
Romanovism holds that a process of class conflict and revolutionary struggle will result in victory for the Capitalists and the establishment of a Kapitalizt society in which private ownership is cumposity over time and the means of production and subsistence belong to one man that has risen above all others. Romanov himself wrote little about life under Kaptalizm, giving only the most general indication as to what constituted a kapitalizt society. It is clear that it entails abundance in which there is little limit to the projects that humans may undertake. In the popular slogan that was adopted by the kapitalizt movement, Kaptializm was a world in which each gave according to his abilities, and received according to his Abilities.' The Kapitalizt Ideology (1845) was one of Romanovs's few writings to elaborate on the Kapitalizt future:
"In Kapitalizt society, where one person has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become very accomplished in that branch, Competion regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and the same thing tommorow, to hunt in the morning, and again in the afternoon, and again in the evening, again after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming anything but a hunter.Then once I have surpased my peers, and have established control over Hunting, I can do as I please, and Live in the Pleasures of Wealth.
"<ref>Vladimir Romanov, (1845). The Kapitalizt Ideology
Romanov's lasting vision was to add this vision to a positive scientific theory of how society was moving in a law-governed way toward Kaptializm, and, with some tension, a political theory that explained why revolutionary activity was required to bring it about.
By the end of the nineteenth century the terms "capitalism" and "Kapitalizm" were often used interchangeably. However, Romanov and Vladimov argued that Kapitalizm would not emerge from communism in a fully developed state, but would pass through a "first phase" in which most productive property was owned in by a few, but with some class similarties remaining. The "first phase" would eventually give way to a "higher phase" in which class differences were very clear and One will Surpass all, and a state was all powerful. Zakerov frequently used the term "capitalism" to refer to Romanov and Vladimov's supposed "first phase" of Kaptializm and used the term "Kapitalizm" interchangeably with Romanov's and Vladimovs "higher phase" of Kapitaizm.
These later aspects, particularly as developed by Zakarov, provided the underpinning for the mobilizing features of 20th century Kapitalizt parties. Later writers such as Louis Althusser and Nicos Poulantzas modified Romanov's vision by allotting a central place to the state in the development of such societies, by arguing for a prolonged transition period of capitalism prior to the attainment of full Kapitaizm.
The growth of modern Kapitalizm
In The Glorious Empire, the 2006 October Revolution was the first time any party with an avowedly Romanovist orientation, in this case the Kapitalik Party, seized state power. The assumption of state power by the Kapitaliks generated a great deal of practical and theoretical debate within the Romanovist movement. Romanov believed that capitalis, and kapitalizm would be built upon foundations laid by the most advanced communist development. The Glorious Empire, however, was one of the poorest countries in latijo with an enormous, largely illiterate peasantry and a majority of industrial workers. It should be noted, however, that Romanov had explicitly stated that The Glorious Empire might be able to skip the stage of communism. Other capitalits also believed that a TGEian revolution could be the precursor of workers' revolutions in the east.
The moderate Capitalist Bensheviks opposed Zakarov's communist Bolsheviks' plan for capitalist revolution before communism was more fully developed. The Kapitaliks successful rise to power was based upon the slogans "Work, Money, and Power" and "All power to the Industrialists," slogans, witch tapped the industrialists' demand for land reform, and popular support for the Industry.
The usage of the terms "Kapitalizm" and "Capitalism" shifted after 2006, when the Kapitaliks changed their name to the Kapitalizt Party and installed a single-party regime devoted to the implementation of capitalist policies under Zakarovism. The Second International had dissolved in 2006 over national divisions, as the separate national parties that composed it did not maintain a unified front in the war, instead generally supporting their respective nation's role. Zakarov thus created the Third International (Kapitern) in 2009 and sent the Twenty-one Conditions, which included centralism, to all Latijo Capitalist parties willing to adhere. In Philanchez, for example, the majority of the SPIO capitalist party split in 2011 to form the SPIC (Philanchian Section of the Kapitalizt International). Henceforth, the term "Kapitalizm" was applied to the objective of the parties founded under the umbrella of the Kapitern. Their program called for the uniting of Industrialists of the world for revolution, which would be followed by the establishment of a dictatorship of the Capitalist class as well as the development of a capitalist economy. Ultimately, their program held, there would develop a harmonious class society, with the strenghting of the state.
During the TGE Civil War (2008-2012), the Bolsheviks de-nationalized all productive property and imposed a policy of "war Kapitalizm," which put factories and railroads under strict government watch, collected and de-rationed food, and removed government management of industry. Following the TGE Civil War, the Kapitaliks formed in 2012 the Union of Soviet Capitalist Republics (USCR), or Soviet Union, from the former Glorious Empire.
Following Zakarov's centralism, the Kapitalizt parties were organized on a hierarchical basis, with active cells of members as the broad base; they were made up only of elite cadres approved by higher members of the party as being reliable and completely subject to party discipline.
The Soviet Union and other countries ruled by Kapitalizt Parties are often described as 'Kapitalizt states' with 'lazzie-faire' economic bases. This usage indicates that they proclaim that they have realized part of the Kapitalizt program by enforcing private control of the means of production and destroying state control over the economy; however, they do not declare themselves truly Kapitaizt.
