Difference between revisions of "Liberal Republican Party"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|+<big><big>'''Liberal Republican Party'''</big></big> | |+<big><big>'''Liberal Republican Party'''</big></big> | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | align="center" colspan="2" | http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y160/Roach-Busters/ | + | | align="center" colspan="2" | http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y160/Roach-Busters/LR_flag.png |
|- | |- | ||
| '''Established''' || 2004 (as the Lefty Loosy Party) | | '''Established''' || 2004 (as the Lefty Loosy Party) |
Revision as of 22:08, 7 February 2006
Established | 2004 (as the Lefty Loosy Party) |
In power since | NA |
Economic ideology | Democratic socialism |
Social ideology | Libertarian |
Party founder | Jill Sprinton |
Party chairman | Abbie Rubin |
Motto | "Power to the people!" |
The Liberal Republican Party is a liberal Roach-Busterian political party founded in 2004 by Jill Sprinton. It is one of the nine legal opposition parties, but has very little public support and is harrassed at every turn by the government.
Stances on issues
Social issues
- Abortion: Strongly pro-choice
- Capital punishment: Strongly oppose
- Church/state: Freedom of religion, but not freedom from religion
- Crime: Criminals should be rehabilitated and/or punished as leniently as possible
- Drugs: Strongly support the legalization of all drugs
- Education: Should receive extremely massive funding
- Euthanasia: Strongly support
- Gay adoption: Strongly support
- Gay marriage: Strongly support
- Gun control: Strongly support
- Healthcare: Should receive extremely massive funding
- Pornography: Strongly support
- Prostitution: Strongly support
Economic issues
- Business regulation: Strongly support
- Environmental protection: Strongly support
- Slave labor: Strongly oppose
- Social welfare: Strongly support
- Subsidies to business: Strongly oppose
- Taxation: Progressive income taxation
- Trade: Fair trade
- Workers' rights: Strongly support
Foreign policy
- Diplomacy: A peaceful, non-aligned foreign policy
- Foreign aid: Strongly support
- Immigration: Strongly support
- Military: Should be just strong enough to provide adequate defense
- United Nations: No opinion