NSWiki:Deletion

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Revision as of 15:50, 16 January 2005 by Wilem Engelking (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

These pages are candidates for deletion by consensus. Please discuss each article on the appropriate article talk page - only edit this page to add or remove deletion candidates.

See NSwiki:Deletion policy for other types of deletion, including speedy deletion criteria.

To request that an article be deleted, please put an {{inclusion}} tag at the top of the article, post your reason for deletion on the article's talk page, and put the following under the current date:

=== PageToBeDeleted ([[Talk:PageToBeDeleted|add to this discussion]]) ===
{{Talk:PageToBeDeleted}}

where PageToBeDeleted is the name of the page you wish to delete.

December 20

HotRodia II (add to this discussion)

"You don't need a separate page for each puppet nation either, unless it has a roleplaying history of its own." from: NSwiki:Avoiding_common_mistakes. Does this have its own RP history? I'm not sure, but maybe someone else does. Rechze • (talk) 06:58, 20 Dec 2004 (GMT)

It will have a roleplay history of its own...when I get around to writing it. HotRodia 08:17, 2 October 2005 (GMT)

HotRodia III (add to this discussion)

Likewise as talk:HotRodia II:

"You don't need a separate page for each puppet nation either, unless it has a roleplaying history of its own." from: NSwiki:Avoiding_common_mistakes. Does this have its own RP history? I'm not sure, but maybe someone else does. Rechze • (talk) 06:59, 20 Dec 2004 (GMT)

inclusion tag removed due to lack of consensus ... (except nobody ever added an inclusion tag) → Fris Θtalk 21:33, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT)

See my comment in the HotRodia II talk page. I will write articles for these nations. All of them that I've created pages for, which is a sight fewer than I have on NS. HotRodia 08:20, 2 October 2005 (GMT)

The USSR (add to this discussion)

See Talk:The Lefts Nirvana for inclusion discussion. (Don't change this to a REDIRECT, please, as this is still a living region of sorts). → Fris Θtalk 15:38, 12 Dec 2004 (GMT)

inclusion tag removed due to lack of consensus → Fris Θtalk 21:34, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Vostokoslavia (add to this discussion)

Too short right now. Needs to be infoboxed at the MINIMUM IMO -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 22:38, 26 Nov 2004 (GMT)

Infobox added, refactored, inclusion tag removed. → Fris Θtalk 21:30, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT)

January 7

Ego Effect (add to this discussion)

Not really an understandable article. Purpose unclear and relation to NS absent.

Talk:Ego Effect

January 8

Mikhail (add to this discussion)

Talk:Mikhail

Whittier Constitution (add to this discussion)

Talk:Whittier Constitution

January 9

Thelona (add to this discussion)

Talk:Thelona

January 10

Ocean's Jewel (Triprism) (add to this discussion)

Talk:Ocean's Jewel (Triprism)

January 13

Collaboration (add to this discussion)

Deletion debate

This discussion is now closed. The inclusion tag was removed on 8 March 2005, with no consensus to delete the article achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. Please start a new section to discuss the article. --Goobergunch|? 03:50, 8 Mar 2005 (GMT)

Added to NSwiki:Deletion on 00:24, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT). Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|?

This page is blank. It's not even a stub.

However, it is regarding a member of the Halls of Memory. Thus I would propose adding it to Requests for expanded articles, instead of removing it altogether. That is to say: Keep. Rechze • (talk) 04:43, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)


This talk page note is unsigned. It's not even a notification of adding an {inclusion} tag. If you're going to list something for deletion, at least make it a little bit easy on the sysops by following NSwiki:deletion policy. And sign your talk page posts, please. → Fris Θtalk 04:15, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)

I think what we have here is a little mutal hostility. Please cut me some slack; I'm not that experienced, and I only saw the article about how to tag an article's talk page after I had made this edit. Please remember that I'm relatively new, and can't be expected to have memorized all the rules yet.
I did notice the unsigned comment, by the way. I didn't re-edit because I was afraid of making too many unnecessary edits. Possibly not a good argument, but at least I have one. --Khrrck 04:27, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)
=== PageToBeDeleted [[Talk:PageToBeDeleted|(add to this discussion)]]===
{{Talk:PageToBeDeleted}}

This bit goes on the page NSwiki:Deletion, and the PageToBeDeleted bits get replaced with the actual article name. → Fris Θtalk 04:33, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)

I do wish you'd do something other than criticize me. --Khrrck 05:12, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)

USSR-ADN Trial/Text add to this discussion)

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The inclusion tag was removed by 15 May 2005 on ~~~~~, with no consensus to delete the article achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. Please start a new section to discuss the article. --Goobergunch|? 16:27, 15 May 2005 (GMT)

Added to NSwiki:Deletion on 00:27, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT). Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|?

This page is 56 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32KB. It also totally lacks any wiki links to other articles.

In addition, I'm quite sure that this document has been posted somewhere on the forums (be they NationStates or offsite) where this thing can easily be linked to instead of slowing down the wiki as per standing wiki policy.-- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 17:39, 30 Dec 2004 (GMT)

  • Agreed. Rechze • (talk) 10:06, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT)
  • Not really - Yet this was a major turning point in NS for many, and did change the ADN and NPO, who were the two major powers at the time. (unsigned edit by 68.56.172.224)
    • But is it available externally? Rechze • (talk) 03:36, 22 Jan 2005 (GMT)
  • Concur with deletion. → Fris Θtalk 19:13, 22 Jan 2005 (GMT)
  • Considering it is detailed elsewhere, and is copied here as a copious block of unsectioned, undivided and purely linear text, besides the space it consumes, this article strikes me as Wiki-unfriendly on the user level as well. To be quite frank, anyone wanting to refer to this would probably look at the lack of divisions and think "This'll take me ages, why bother?" Concur. IdioC- エドの狂いtalk 21:19, 22 Jan 2005 (GMT)

It is not available to the public anywhere else. The only other place is the USSR forums or ADN forums, both have to be registered, approved, and not IP banned.(unsigned edit by 68.56.172.224)

My sentiment lays neutral now then. Rechze • (talk) 06:28, 8 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  • Note that is is inaccessible on the ADN forum because this decision was on the old (s3) forums, which are no longer open to anybody except Pope Hope and maybe another admin or two. However, source material such as this really isn't appropriate for the wiki, so I'm not going to vote yea or nay here. --Goobergunch|? 19:26, 8 Feb 2005 (GMT)
    • I'd say keep it, then. However, it needs to be wikified if kept, adding links and headings. ~ Nanakaland 19:45, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)

January 16

Cokm (add to this discussion)

Deletion discussion

The article consists mostly of RL-referring invectives. -- Wilem Engelking 19:48, 16 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Maccool (add to this discussion)

Do I really even need to explain why this is NPOV? -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 12:20, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Deletion discussion

The article consists mostly of RL-referring invectives. -- Wilem Engelking 19:48, 16 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Retrieved from "http://archive.nswiki.org/index.php?title=NSWiki:Deletion&oldid=30832"