Difference between revisions of "NSWiki:New admins"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 19: Line 19:
 
'''Comments/Questions'''
 
'''Comments/Questions'''
 
3 users have voted for.  There are currently 5 in NSWiki.  I think that that means that I'm in!  I'd like to thank Goobergunch for making this wiki. And East Germany for voting for me.  [[User:Defaultia|Defaultia]] 21:34, 23 Sep 2004 (GMT)
 
3 users have voted for.  There are currently 5 in NSWiki.  I think that that means that I'm in!  I'd like to thank Goobergunch for making this wiki. And East Germany for voting for me.  [[User:Defaultia|Defaultia]] 21:34, 23 Sep 2004 (GMT)
 +
 +
=== [[User:Knootoss|Knootoss]] (10/4/0) ===
 +
'''Granted provisionally by [[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 20:17, 7 Oct 2004 (GMT)'''
 +
 +
I'd recommend [[Knootoss]] --[[User:Frisbeeteria|Frisbeeteria]] 01:55, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
 +
:Heh. Thanks ^_^;;;; - [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]] 08:44, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
 +
'''Support'''
 +
 +
# I support. He's active and a good contributor. [[User:Crimmer|Crimmer]] 12:42, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
# [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]] accepts the nomination.
 +
# What Crimmer said, very active and very helpful edits. Also very helpful on IRC.  --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]][[Goobergunchia|ia]] 16:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
# Meh.  My vote belongs in the tally for Knoot.  --[[User:Frisbeeteria|Frisbeeteria]] 18:04, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
# Def votes for. --[[User:Defaultia|Defaultia]] 23:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
# [[User:Diablo_NL|Diablo_NL]] votes for Knootoss. He has so far done a great job. And if he screws it up I can always go by and punish him. ;) [[User:Diablo NL|Diablo NL]]
 +
#:Edits by [[User:82.156.36.49]] count towards validity of [[User:Diablo_NL]]'s vote. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 23:23, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
# I support Knootoss.  If the CACE clique is so worried about his free-market bias, why don't they nominate one of their own, like Xiukang, for sysop? [[User:Syskeyia|Syskeyia]] 6:39, 10 Oct 2004 (Central Time)
 +
# Go Knootoss!.  [[User:Iuthia|Iuthia]] 00:30, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
#K-stan says "yea" to Knoot, even if he is Dutch.  :)  [[User:K-stan|K-stan]] 7:53, 10 Oct 2004 (EST)
 +
# The Serene^Union gives a thumbs up to Knootoss. [[user:Kaenei|Kaenei]]
 +
#:Only other edit by this user is on [[NSwiki:Logo candidates]] - however, it takes a good deal of time and effort to make a logo. --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 00:06, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
 +
'''Oppose'''
 +
# I am against; K is not neutral and incapable of being neutral. --[[User:Pudding|Pudding]]
 +
# As much as I am a friend of this individual, I would think it may be wiser to find a less controversial player who's made it a point never to cross anyone on purpose. --[[User:Galdago|Galdago]]
 +
# This would alienate a great many people from NSwiki. No. [[User:Rehochipe|Rehochipe]]
 +
#:Apart from a few political enemies (who I've yet to see as active NSwiki contributors), who exactly would this alienate?  That's an awfully large position stated in awfully few words. - [[User:Frisbeeteria|Frisbeeteria]] 22:54, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
# I can see, actually, whom this would alienate and discourage from becoming productive contributors to the NS Wiki project. Nothing personal, but Knootoss is a nation that not many would consider seperable from nation-based biases. I find I must vote no.[[User:TJHairball|TJHairball]]
 +
 +
'''Neutral'''
 +
 +
'''Comments/Questions'''
 +
 +
* [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]]: Well, I'm not sure how to count the votes here (I'd say [[User:Frisbeeteria|Frisbeeteria]] counts as 'pro' too. The lesson of Florida: when in doubt, count the votes in your favour ;)  Anyway I'll just wait untill people come and complain about my inherent bias and incompetence.
 +
:Meh.  I don't count the nomination as a vote, but I'm for letting Frisbeeteria vote - when I nominated Defaultia, I immediately voted "1. [[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]][[Goobergunchia|ia]] As in nomination".  --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]][[Goobergunchia|ia]] 16:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
You are too kind ^_^ *is a happy [[Elves|elf]]] now*
 +
 +
 +
* Since it seems particularly pointless to wait a proper seven days, I'm granting Knoot provisional sysop status now - however, the vote will remain open for the full seven-day period and this status can be revoked if there's a shift in the voting margin.  --[[User:Goobergunch|Goobergunch]]|[[User talk:Goobergunch|?]] 20:17, 7 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 +
 +
 +
* I'm not sure I'm really keen on the idea of someone who can pointedly indicate on his [http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/member.php?u=94163 Jolt Forum Profile] that his occupation is "emotionally harassing SeOCC" is the kind of individual that should be moderating a site where you're probably going to be having a lot of contribution by the CACE community, of which myself and SeOCC are a part.  There's a clear wedge between much of the CACE and former SATO/WBO entourage that, should either of the polarized members of those parties become moderators of the NSwiki site, might compromise an impartial view of the NationStates world should any one of them get... shall we say... as "childish" as that profile entry? --[[User:Galdago|Galdago]]
 +
 +
* 8:44, seven day period is over. I'm closing the poll. Full statement later. [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]] 08:44, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Revision as of 04:44, 11 October 2004

<From NSwiki:Admin nominations

Defaultia (3/0/0)

Sysophood granted by Goobergunchia 22:04, 26 Sep 2004 (GMT)

Defaultia has been one of the earliest NSwikians and has written (or at least begun) many important articles, such as Moderator, Region, and Region crashing. Defaultia has also provided us with the temporary logo. --Goobergunchia 20:36, 19 Sep 2004 (GMT)

I Accept :-P Defaultia 23:19, 19 Sep 2004 (GMT)

Support

  1. As in nomination Goobergunchia 20:36, 19 Sep 2004 (GMT)
  2. I think I'm allowed to vote for my self... Defaultia 10:34, 20 Sep 2004 (GMT)
  3. Sure... East Germany 06:43, 23 Sep 2004 (GMT)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments/Questions 3 users have voted for. There are currently 5 in NSWiki. I think that that means that I'm in! I'd like to thank Goobergunch for making this wiki. And East Germany for voting for me. Defaultia 21:34, 23 Sep 2004 (GMT)

Knootoss (10/4/0)

Granted provisionally by Goobergunch|? 20:17, 7 Oct 2004 (GMT)

I'd recommend Knootoss --Frisbeeteria 01:55, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Heh. Thanks ^_^;;;; - Knoot 08:44, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Support

  1. I support. He's active and a good contributor. Crimmer 12:42, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
  2. Knoot accepts the nomination.
  3. What Crimmer said, very active and very helpful edits. Also very helpful on IRC. --Goobergunchia 16:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
  4. Meh. My vote belongs in the tally for Knoot. --Frisbeeteria 18:04, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
  5. Def votes for. --Defaultia 23:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)
  6. Diablo_NL votes for Knootoss. He has so far done a great job. And if he screws it up I can always go by and punish him. ;) Diablo NL
    Edits by User:82.156.36.49 count towards validity of User:Diablo_NL's vote. --Goobergunch|? 23:23, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT)
  7. I support Knootoss. If the CACE clique is so worried about his free-market bias, why don't they nominate one of their own, like Xiukang, for sysop? Syskeyia 6:39, 10 Oct 2004 (Central Time)
  8. Go Knootoss!. Iuthia 00:30, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)
  9. K-stan says "yea" to Knoot, even if he is Dutch.  :) K-stan 7:53, 10 Oct 2004 (EST)
  10. The Serene^Union gives a thumbs up to Knootoss. Kaenei
    Only other edit by this user is on NSwiki:Logo candidates - however, it takes a good deal of time and effort to make a logo. --Goobergunch|? 00:06, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Oppose

  1. I am against; K is not neutral and incapable of being neutral. --Pudding
  2. As much as I am a friend of this individual, I would think it may be wiser to find a less controversial player who's made it a point never to cross anyone on purpose. --Galdago
  3. This would alienate a great many people from NSwiki. No. Rehochipe
    Apart from a few political enemies (who I've yet to see as active NSwiki contributors), who exactly would this alienate? That's an awfully large position stated in awfully few words. - Frisbeeteria 22:54, 10 Oct 2004 (GMT)
  4. I can see, actually, whom this would alienate and discourage from becoming productive contributors to the NS Wiki project. Nothing personal, but Knootoss is a nation that not many would consider seperable from nation-based biases. I find I must vote no.TJHairball

Neutral

Comments/Questions

  • Knoot: Well, I'm not sure how to count the votes here (I'd say Frisbeeteria counts as 'pro' too. The lesson of Florida: when in doubt, count the votes in your favour ;) Anyway I'll just wait untill people come and complain about my inherent bias and incompetence.
Meh. I don't count the nomination as a vote, but I'm for letting Frisbeeteria vote - when I nominated Defaultia, I immediately voted "1. Goobergunchia As in nomination". --Goobergunchia 16:34, 4 Oct 2004 (GMT)

You are too kind ^_^ *is a happy elf] now*


  • Since it seems particularly pointless to wait a proper seven days, I'm granting Knoot provisional sysop status now - however, the vote will remain open for the full seven-day period and this status can be revoked if there's a shift in the voting margin. --Goobergunch|? 20:17, 7 Oct 2004 (GMT)


  • I'm not sure I'm really keen on the idea of someone who can pointedly indicate on his Jolt Forum Profile that his occupation is "emotionally harassing SeOCC" is the kind of individual that should be moderating a site where you're probably going to be having a lot of contribution by the CACE community, of which myself and SeOCC are a part. There's a clear wedge between much of the CACE and former SATO/WBO entourage that, should either of the polarized members of those parties become moderators of the NSwiki site, might compromise an impartial view of the NationStates world should any one of them get... shall we say... as "childish" as that profile entry? --Galdago
  • 8:44, seven day period is over. I'm closing the poll. Full statement later. Knoot 08:44, 11 Oct 2004 (GMT)