Difference between revisions of "National Conservative Party"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | The '''National Conservative Party''' | + | The '''National Conservative Party''' was a [[Wikipedia:Neoconservatism|neoconservative]] [[Roach-Busters|Roach-Busterian]] [[Wikipedia:Political party|political party]] founded in [[Wikipedia:2004|2004]] by Donald Megan. It was one of the nine legal opposition parties. It is no longer legal, however. |
== Stances on issues == | == Stances on issues == |
Revision as of 17:46, 22 February 2006
Established | 2004 (as the Neoconservative Party) |
In power since | NA |
Economic ideology | Corporatism |
Social ideology | Conservatism/moralism |
Party founder | Donald Megan |
Party chairman | Donald Megan |
Motto | "Government may not be the solution to the problem, but to us it is" |
The National Conservative Party was a neoconservative Roach-Busterian political party founded in 2004 by Donald Megan. It was one of the nine legal opposition parties. It is no longer legal, however.
Stances on issues
Social issues
- Abortion: Oppose
- Capital punishment: Support
- Church/state: Support an official state religion
- Crime: Should be dealt with severely
- Drugs: Strongly oppose
- Education: Should receive slightly less funding than liberals desire
- Euthanasia: Oppose
- Gay adoption: Oppose
- Gay marriage: Oppose, but support civil unions
- Gun control: Slightly oppose
- Healthcare: Should receive slightly less funding than liberals desire
- Pornography: Oppose
- Prostitution: Oppose
Economic issues
- Business regulation: Slightly support
- Environmental protection: Strongly oppose
- Slave labor: Oppose
- Social welfare: Officially oppose, but in reality, slightly support
- Subsidies to business: Strongly support
- Taxation: Slightly support
- Trade: High tariffs
- Workers' rights: Slightly oppose
Foreign policy
- Diplomacy: An aggressive, beligerent, interventionist foreign policy
- Foreign aid: Support
- Immigration: Support immigration, including illegal immigration
- Military: Should be large and well-funded, but weak and ineffective
- United Nations: Officially oppose, but in reality, support