Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ausserland Flag Museum"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Why the revert? The article really ought to be more encyclopedic than it is, and layout should be done with CSS rather than tables... [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 22:48, 31 October 2006 (GMT)
 
Why the revert? The article really ought to be more encyclopedic than it is, and layout should be done with CSS rather than tables... [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 22:48, 31 October 2006 (GMT)
 +
 +
I won't presume to speak for the sysop who did the revert, but I will explain why I objected strongly to the editing you did. After your edit, the text appeared cramped and was less readable. White space is the reader's friend. Your edit changed the consistently conversational style into a stylistic jumble. And the edit destroyed the developmental presentation of the text/graphic combination. If the content of the page is unacceptable by NSWiki standards, it should be deleted. I will then remove the links to it.

Revision as of 18:24, 2 November 2006

Why the revert? The article really ought to be more encyclopedic than it is, and layout should be done with CSS rather than tables... Ceoranta 22:48, 31 October 2006 (GMT)

I won't presume to speak for the sysop who did the revert, but I will explain why I objected strongly to the editing you did. After your edit, the text appeared cramped and was less readable. White space is the reader's friend. Your edit changed the consistently conversational style into a stylistic jumble. And the edit destroyed the developmental presentation of the text/graphic combination. If the content of the page is unacceptable by NSWiki standards, it should be deleted. I will then remove the links to it.