Talk:Ausserland Flag Museum
Why the revert? The article really ought to be more encyclopedic than it is, and layout should be done with CSS rather than tables... Ceoranta 22:48, 31 October 2006 (GMT)
I won't presume to speak for the sysop who did the revert, but I will explain why I objected strongly to the editing you did. After your edit, the text appeared cramped and was less readable. White space is the reader's friend. Your edit changed the consistently conversational style into a stylistic jumble. And the edit destroyed the developmental presentation of the text/graphic combination. If the content of the page is unacceptable by NSWiki standards, it should be deleted. I will then remove the links to it. The preceding unsigned comment was posted by Ausserland.
The content is fine, it's the style that's messed up. "Conversational" style isn't really what is required for an encyclopedia, and how-to/second-person sections definitely are out. And the use of a table at the bottom is, for one, not good use of HTML, and also adds superfluous space that looks rather ugly at the bottom. Ceoranta 22:58, 2 November 2006 (GMT)
