Difference between revisions of "Talk:Baptism of Fire"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
(removed old an unnecessary discussion, pertaining to a person's entry request from many BoFs ago) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
I think it is inappropriate and misleading to refer to BoFs by the corresponding World Cup #. Nowhere else is this done. RP threads, discussion threads & scoring threads all refer to a BoF by its own number. [[User:Willd|willd]] 15:25, 12 September 2007 (GMT) | I think it is inappropriate and misleading to refer to BoFs by the corresponding World Cup #. Nowhere else is this done. RP threads, discussion threads & scoring threads all refer to a BoF by its own number. [[User:Willd|willd]] 15:25, 12 September 2007 (GMT) | ||
Actually, they usually have been referred to by their corresponding WC number, though this time around was an exception. Other than making a note about the fact that the number listed refers to the corresponding WC, I don't see a need to change the reference. [[User:Novapsolu|Novapsolu]] 19:43, 12 September 2007 (GMT) | Actually, they usually have been referred to by their corresponding WC number, though this time around was an exception. Other than making a note about the fact that the number listed refers to the corresponding WC, I don't see a need to change the reference. [[User:Novapsolu|Novapsolu]] 19:43, 12 September 2007 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 15:49, 12 September 2007
I think it is inappropriate and misleading to refer to BoFs by the corresponding World Cup #. Nowhere else is this done. RP threads, discussion threads & scoring threads all refer to a BoF by its own number. willd 15:25, 12 September 2007 (GMT)
Actually, they usually have been referred to by their corresponding WC number, though this time around was an exception. Other than making a note about the fact that the number listed refers to the corresponding WC, I don't see a need to change the reference. Novapsolu 19:43, 12 September 2007 (GMT)
