Difference between revisions of "Talk:Coalition of Anti-Capitalist Economies/Archive"

Revision as of 13:28, 24 October 2004

Pudding

Since we're all a bunch of red bastards, the CACE is going to keep our red background, thanks.

Let's not start editing other people's entries to make petty points. I'm refereing to the edit that said that CACE makes it's decisions behind closed doors. Utter rubbish. A few people may think that way because they're been banned from the site for getting their friends to aqcuire passwords and using them to gain access to the secutiry forum - note: security, not policy - or that users are now required to register on the CACE forums before gaining acces to them. No restirictions are placed on registration (unless you're banned for the aforementioned reasons).

So please, let's not go down this road or the site will become useless.

--Celdonia 13:31, 15 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Coalition of Anti-Capitalist Economies FAC Vote (0/0/0)

• Just a request - could people please remember to sign their votes with 4 tildes (~~~~) and update the vote tally when they vote? Thanks. --Goobergunch

Support

1. Nominated by me as an historically significant, and very log standing alliance --Celdonia 17:18, 24 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Oppose

1. It seems to me a featured article should be of high quality and this is a rather short entry that does not really stand out one way or the other. The "political significance" should make no difference IMO. If it had a history and an overview of policies and all that it would be a different matter. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 17:28, 24 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Neutral

Comments/Questions