Talk:Dafitopiapolis/NPOV

The following vote on Dafitopiapolis was held; the decision was not neutral. Please do not change these archived comments. ~Gruen2 23:45, 1 May 2006 (GMT)

Dafitopiapolis NPOV Poll (5/0/0)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes (~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Biased

1. Article is clearly biased, but the nation owner could surely rephrase it to avoid the label. I'd be delighted to change my vote to neutral or not biased, given the opportunity. → Fris Θtalk 23:26, 22 Nov 2004 (GMT)
2. Oh, so agreed. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 14:10, 30 Nov 2004 (GMT)
3. You must be joking. We do have a NPOV policy, right? Ainulindalion 03:11, 3 Mar 2005 (GMT)
4. Concur. Rechze • (talk) 08:27, 4 Mar 2005 (GMT)
5. Too late for me to pile on? Hack 08:46, 15 Mar 2005 (GMT)

Not Biased

Neutral / not clear

Comments/Questions

I have rephrased it slightly 'He now considers both organisations to be utterly corrupt' etc. So can the NPOV dispute be removed now? The article needs tidying up still, which I am working on -Dafi