Talk:Falastur/FAC vote

Falastur/FAC vote FAC Vote (4/0/1)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes (~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

1. It is succinct, well organised, and comprehensive. Rechze 06:29, 1 Nov 2004 (GMT)
2. I would prefer to see his monarch page nominated (as well perhaps?) but this is a darn good page. The chart is well done, even though I don't generally like those sorts of things. -- Iansisle 07:30, 1 Nov 2004 (GMT)
3. This article is well done, well organized, and many information is given. Nanakaland 21:44, 13 Nov 2004 (GMT)
4. Good info, well organized, and you have to acknowledge it only comes from within one person's head, so... wow... I want to be like you when I grow up Falastur. Bariloche 20:20, 14 Nov 2004 (GMT)

Oppose

1. I'm afraid I can't agree with the nominator. The Overview and Structure sections are quite good, and I also like the table, but the cut-n-paste UN section and NSEconomy statistics detract from the overall feel of the page. I'd happily support nomination of one of the monarch pages (not the list, mind you), and with the ongoing historical development I'd say the Falastur Factbook would be a worthy candidate soon. For now, it's just too choppy. → Fris Θtalk 14:44, 1 Nov 2004 (GMT)

Neutral

1. Before I say anything, I'd like to add that this is not to win votes, it is merely to defend my styling of my article.
   • Firstly, I cut-and-pasted those sections because my page is primarily so those who know little of Falastur can learn about it. I will rewrite it if people ask me to, but I think that it was written well by [violet], and thus anything I rewrite would detract from the quality. I may later expand on it to give it more of a personal feel.
   • Secondly, my Falastur page is not completely finished, although I aim to make it look like it is finished so it doesn't make potential readers choose to skip it. I'm hoping that when it is finished, the copy-and-paste jobs will be much less noticable. When I have some free time (hopefully today) I will track down a code on wiki that boxes the charts down the bottom look better. That, or I might just delete them if I think about it and decide they aren't achieving anything.
   • Thirdly, if you have disagreements with the styling of any of my articles, please write it in my Talk page so I can act on it and make it better to read.

   Thanks.... -- Falastur 16:21, 1 Nov 2004 (GMT)

Comments/Questions

1. Well his monarch 'page' is only a list, but I agree some of the individual monarchs' pages are very good
2. My comments were not intended as insult to either style or content, merely a comment as to article completeness and originality. I like Falastur's style on the original portions, which is why the UN report is so jarring. They don't mesh. As to the economic stats, I'd be delighted to see them used to justify or enhance a description of the economy of Falastur, but simply cutting and pasting the numbers from a page linked to every nation's infobox doesn't add, it subtracts. The all-original royalty articles give a much better picture of the author's writing, so I think the nomination belongs there, not here. → Fris Θtalk 17:10, 1 Nov 2004 (GMT)
   1. Sure, ok. I've got no work to do for tomorrow, so as we speak I am looking into ways to improve it. Rewriting that UN report is now top of my list, and I'll try and think of a way of turning the more useful portions of the info into prose. Check back, 'cos I'll probably update it regularly as I think of something better to put. -- Falastur 17:14, 1 Nov 2004 (GMT)
      • Made a few improvements, although I will probably make more yet. Care to see what you think now? -- Falastur 00:47, 2 Nov 2004 (GMT)
   2. I'm too tired to read all of it, but what I did read was enough for me to remove my objection. Perhaps after reading it I'll switch to an endorsement. I appreciate you putting the effort into it in any case. → Fris Θtalk 03:54, 2 Nov 2004 (GMT)
   3. Thanks. -- Falastur 23:15, 2 Nov 2004 (GMT)