Talk:Gulden/Archive
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Gulden FAC Vote (11/1/0) CLOSED
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- I think this deserves a chance to be featured. Since this is the only currency related article containing so much information on a monetary system and its history, I'd like to give it a shot. Tell me what you think. The Mystery Man 09:51, 5 March 2006 (GMT)
- Seconded. It's a good and original article. Hogsweat 09:54, 5 March 2006 (GMT)
- Support: a nice article on a relatively untouched subject. The only problem, if it does get featured, will be which bits to use, as most of the tables are too bulky. Gruen2alk 14:25, 7 March 2006 (GMT)
- Support This is an excellent article on a currency, the standard to which I'm trying to build mine up to. Full support. Skinny87 16:42, 5 April 2006 (GMT)
- Support Best currency article. Hope to see this as a featured article. United Island Empires 08:36, 6 May 2006 (GMT)
- Support The best currency article among the "Major Currencies" (see controversy at Template_talk:Currencies), whose only competition is the Douro, but since I haven't read every article in the entire category, I can't say for sure it's best. Good mix of text and illustrations, but I'm not sure how many illustrations are original with the author. When I have time, I will go back and make a few minor spelling corrections. Clearly superior to my own text-only Denkmark. Sober Thought 03:53, 21 June 2006 (GMT)
- Support per all above comments, but see note below. Ceo \ rant \ rave 04:00, 21 June 2006 (GMT)
- Support as above, but you need to update your exchange rates. ;) (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 08:07, 1 October 2006 (GMT)
- Support The most comprehensive currency article I've seen here. Jey° 00:09, 17 October 2006 (GMT)
- Support Well done, concise, etc. Isselmere-Nieland 09:19, 29 December 2006 (GMT)
- Support Well written, probably the best currency article we have. swilatia 11:50, 9 July 2007 (GMT)
Oppose
- Opposed I really hate to do this because I like the guffingford guy, but for fuck's sake this has nothing to do with anything in the game or what his nation is like. Nice as a little extra or something, but shouldn't be a featured article.Anarchy Balsac 03:45, 10 December 2006 (GMT)
- What are you talking about? This page deals with the nation's currency, a large aspect of every nation. Not every page has to deal with either NationStates or the nations therein. Many pages deal with certain aspects of nations, such as histories, languages, wars, important people, or currency pages like this one. The fact that they are not nation pages has nothing to do with their ability to be featured. Jey° 01:33, 28 December 2006 (GMT)
Neutral
Comments/Questions
- This article pertains to the currency of a nation that no longer exists, and will definitely not come back. Doesn't this qualify it for deletion or at least past-tensifying? Ceo \ rant \ rave 04:00, 21 June 2006 (GMT)
- I hope not deletion! Such fine work deserves a permanent home, even if the nation itself has vanished. I can see how a past-tense edit might be appropriate, and I would volunteer to do one if it reached featured article status. Sober Thought 04:13, 21 June 2006 (GMT)
- On the deletion comment, Pacitalia personally assured me all of my NSwiki work is allowed to remain, since I never done anything wrong here - in fact, I made this place better! Past-tensifying however, is something I agree with. The Mystery Man 09:30, 23 June 2006 (GMT) (Guffingford talking from beyond)
- I would hope the article isn't deleted. I'm not personally concerned about tense. However, it may not be featured, at least for some time. ~Gruen2alk 10:26, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
- Deleting items from past nations would be like removing articles of dead civilisations from encyclopedias (encyclopaediae?), especially if it is an accomplished article. I likewise concur about putting it in the past tense. Isselmere-Nieland 09:19, 29 December 2006 (GMT)
