Difference between revisions of "Talk:Isselmere-Nieland"
Germanalasia (Talk | contribs) |
m |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Good coverage, overall quite good. I'd support featured articleness as well. --[[User:Kelssek|Kelssek]] 10:34, 18 November 2006 (GMT) | Good coverage, overall quite good. I'd support featured articleness as well. --[[User:Kelssek|Kelssek]] 10:34, 18 November 2006 (GMT) | ||
| − | :Thanks to both of you. I'll try to get this page up to snuff so that it might eventually be nominated for FAC status. [[User:Isselmere-Nieland|Isselmere-Nieland]] 21:26, 4 January 2007 (GMT) | + | :Thanks to both of you. I'll try to get this page up to snuff so that it might eventually be nominated for FAC status. -- [[User:Isselmere-Nieland|Isselmere-Nieland]] 21:26, 4 January 2007 (GMT) |
Extremely well written and constructed article. I am very impressed by your work. [[User:ITD|ITD]] 20:16, 12 January 2007 (GMT) | Extremely well written and constructed article. I am very impressed by your work. [[User:ITD|ITD]] 20:16, 12 January 2007 (GMT) | ||
| − | :Thanks! [[User:Isselmere-Nieland|Isselmere-Nieland]] 07:34, 19 May 2007 (GMT) | + | :Thanks! -- [[User:Isselmere-Nieland|Isselmere-Nieland]] 07:34, 19 May 2007 (GMT) |
Oooh, I absolutely love it - not only is the article wonderfully detailed, but the good supply of sideline material is masterfully manipulated into the prose to add a huge quantity of realism. It is by far better than several existing FACs, methinks. Surely, such an article - and series of articles - as you have achieved here should be the goal for anyone writing on NSwiki. --[[User:Germanalasia|Germanalasia]] 12:57, 4 July 2007 (GMT) | Oooh, I absolutely love it - not only is the article wonderfully detailed, but the good supply of sideline material is masterfully manipulated into the prose to add a huge quantity of realism. It is by far better than several existing FACs, methinks. Surely, such an article - and series of articles - as you have achieved here should be the goal for anyone writing on NSwiki. --[[User:Germanalasia|Germanalasia]] 12:57, 4 July 2007 (GMT) | ||
| + | :Thanks! -- [[User:Isselmere-Nieland|Isselmere-Nieland]] 21:36, 4 July 2007 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:36, 4 July 2007
Constructive comments may be entered here in order to improve this or associated pages. Thank you -- Isselmere-Nieland 06:26, 12 June 2006 (GMT)
This is a REALLY good page, congrats! However, can it not be split up into few pages? Cheers :) Spaam 06:41, 28 September 2006 (GMT)
- Thanks. I'm planning on splitting this into more reasonable segments sometime in the future, but I don't know when I'll have the time. -- Isselmere-Nieland 21:30, 28 September 2006 (GMT)
Damn it......this really should be nominated as a featured article candidate, Isselmere-Nieland. Sheer brilliance in detail as usual, Issel. Why not add it to that list? I'll be sure to vote for it. ;-) Southeastasia 14:32, 31 October 2006 (GMT)
Good coverage, overall quite good. I'd support featured articleness as well. --Kelssek 10:34, 18 November 2006 (GMT)
- Thanks to both of you. I'll try to get this page up to snuff so that it might eventually be nominated for FAC status. -- Isselmere-Nieland 21:26, 4 January 2007 (GMT)
Extremely well written and constructed article. I am very impressed by your work. ITD 20:16, 12 January 2007 (GMT)
- Thanks! -- Isselmere-Nieland 07:34, 19 May 2007 (GMT)
Oooh, I absolutely love it - not only is the article wonderfully detailed, but the good supply of sideline material is masterfully manipulated into the prose to add a huge quantity of realism. It is by far better than several existing FACs, methinks. Surely, such an article - and series of articles - as you have achieved here should be the goal for anyone writing on NSwiki. --Germanalasia 12:57, 4 July 2007 (GMT)
- Thanks! -- Isselmere-Nieland 21:36, 4 July 2007 (GMT)
