Talk:Nakism/Archive

Nakism FAC Vote (1/7/1) CLOSED

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

1. Good article. Lightman 18:25, 5 September 2006 (GMT)
2. I actually like this, so here's a vote. Allanea 09:41, 6 May 2007 (GMT)

Oppose

1. On reflection, hard oppose. It's just a copy, and switching z's for k's really isn't that clever. ~Gruen2alk 10:56, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
2. Agreed with Gruen. ^Je_y^° 14:56, 15 October 2006 (GMT)
3. It just looks a bit too similar to the Nazism Wikipedia article linked above by Gruen. Even though that in itself isn't a bad thing, it's not original enough for a featured article I think :: BramP 22:53, 15 October 2006 (GMT)
4. Rip-off of a wikipedia article, thus very unoriginal. --swilatia 12:48, 5 December 2006 (GMT)
5. Agreed re: above comments. You're taking a few too many liberties with the concept of free-use literature and free documentation. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 19:56, 21 December 2006 (GMT)
6. No... a copy of a good article should not be a featured article. Free Outer Eugenia 20:21, 22 April 2007 (GMT)
7. Got to be kidding me this is just a copy of Nazism, didn't even bother changing the names or symbols by more than 1 letter... "Adolf Hister" come on John 14:42, 6 May 2007 (GMT)

Neutral

1. Yes, it is a decent article. My neutral vote is a concern for precedent and image: do we want what is essentially a redub of Nazism on the front page of NSwiki? ~Gruen2alk 10:48, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
2. Neutral, leaning towards Oppose. It's quite complete, and I'm sure you've spent time writing it all, but there's nothing particularly original in it. Aridd 23:50, 14 October 2006 (GMT)