Talk:Niploma

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Revision as of 17:13, 30 April 2007 by AP310 (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Niploma FAC Vote (4/2/3)

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote. NO, REALLY.

Support

  1. Here here! Say yes! The preceding unsigned comment was written by User:Niploma
  2. Tentative support. There are some annoying spelling mistakes, and the style is sometimes clumsy, but on the whole it's a fairly complete and nicely done article. Aridd 23:41, 14 October 2006 (GMT)
  3. Well, he's my Founder. I definitely like how much time he's put into this nation's history, and the attention to detail is incredible. That, and being a Featured Article will get Hethrum some good PR, haha. Kithicor 02:12, 6 January 2007 (GMT)
  4. My position on this is similar to Aridd's Free Outer Eugenia 11:56, 22 April 2007 (GMT)

Oppose

  1. The pictures are almost all oversized, the political parties table uses several invalid values for the bgcolor attribute (specifically, orange, gold, rose, brown, and azure), which causes strange results in some browsers, rendering text unreadable, and the infobox is so badly slanied that I can’t even begin to explain (the problems are probably related to the use of tables within tables and the value 0 for the colspan attribute). However, other than these issues, it seems to be a good article. —Commerce Heights (talk) 01:45, 21 June 2006 (GMT)
  2. Mild oppose, armed forces section needs cleanup, infobox and parties box need to be fixed per CH, prose isn't great. Probably could make it to feature quality with a little more work. Ceo \ rant \ rave

Neutral

  1. Not bad in principle, but the grammar is not great, and it's awkwardly presented. However, not a bad example of a main page. ~Gruen2alk 10:50, 6 September 2006 (GMT)
  2. Good start, but agreed with Gruen that the presentation of it needs some tweaking. Content is solid. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 05:25, 13 October 2006 (GMT)
  3. This could be an excellent article, definately worthy of featuring, with some tweaking. Jey° 13:27, 15 October 2006 (GMT)

Comments/Questions

Hi, Niploma, cool page, there is still a link from the hethrum page, i am renewing it today and was wondering if you wanted it removed. We haven't heard from you recently,etc,etc

AP3 10 UN Delegate for Hethrum Interim Leader

Retrieved from "http://archive.nswiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Niploma&oldid=283281"