Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The article was deleted by 22 March 2005 on {{{2}}}, with consensus to delete achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. --Goobergunch|? 19:16, 22 Mar 2005 (GMT)

Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|? 01:29, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)

First of all, a is not an undertakers ministry thing but it has been used by others as well. Second of all, it is better to make a good article in one session then to just post a picture of a palantir in an article. This is useless and confusing for people visiting the page. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 16:42, 22 Feb 2005 (GMT)

• Delete. Usually I'd vote a weak "keep and expand" for articles that probably merit inclusion, but don't have enough information to be useful. However, this article is kind of useless, as it contains no information not found in Wikipedia. --Goobergunch|? 01:29, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
• Delete. I suspect that it may have been reserved, or created in advance of including content. This is a practice which I personally see no purpose for, as reserving so as to get one's own article under the correct name, would be utterly in vain, that is why we have disambiguation pages. If another were to have composed an article of the same name, that of a reserved article, chances are that the article with content would be put in place of the empty one. Moreover even prelaying an empty page seems to me fairly pointless. Rechze • (talk) 10:05, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)