Talk:Pantocratoria/Archive
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Pantocratoria FAC Vote (10/0/0) CLOSED
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- I'm nominating this because I consider it a very well-written and thoroughly thought out nation article. (~~~~)Owain Θtalk
- I guess this merits a feature. → Ceo \ squawk 14:20, 13 January 2006 (GMT)
- Outstanding article. 'Nuff said. The Mystery Man 20:10, 14 January 2006 (GMT)
- Impressive and thorough. My compliments to the chef. (( Pacitalkia )) Time sent: 18:57, 19 January 2006 (GMT)
- Nice enough. Gruen2alk 19:43, 19 January 2006 (GMT)
- A most excellent article. And I like the custom Infobox you made (I used it for mine.) Oh, and for the vote, ( ~~~~) ~Sys
- Well thankyou very much, but if you're referring to the new nation infobox, I can't take the credit because I didn't make it, I just found it in my random wanderings through the template pages and used it. --Pantocratoria 13:25, 16 March 2006 (GMT)
- Well-written, thorough and informative. It's almost enough to make one believe that Pantocratoria is a real nation. --Excalbia 20:32, 11 June 2006 (GMT)
- An oustanding article. Lightman 01:17, 16 November 2006 (GMT)
- To echo Excalbia's comments, the article is such that it does make you think that Pantocratoria is a real place. If I could, my next holidays would surely be there. Uncle Noel 19:02, 24th November 2006
- The Latinian has a better article than me :( Jester 11:50, 13 December 2006 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments/Questions
I think the strong red and green colours used for political parties harm readibility. I presume the blue is paler in order for links to be readable, and the red and green would benefit from a similar change. Other than that, it's a impressive article. --Safalra 14:39, 13 January 2006 (GMT)
