Talk:Scolopendra/Archive

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Scolopendra FAC Vote (5/6/5) CLOSED

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

  1. Very informative, extremely well written and organized. A clear example of some of NSWiki's best work. Khen 14:52, 14 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  2. Freod 23:37, 14 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  3. Mikhail 20:55, 27 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  4. I can't think of any reason to not support it. Nightbane 21:22, 4 August 2005 (GMT)
  5. I agree that the article is well written and organized. As for pictures, while I agree a few would be nice I don't feel they should always be a requirement. Mikitivity 02:46, 4 December 2005 (GMT)

Oppose

  1. Object. I would have to disagree with Khen, it could use some small revision and reformatting. At times it is not most logically ordered. (eg: position of lists; should probably be as an annex would), and the prose is in need of work in a few parts. Although this is nothing large, I would resent its being promoted to featured article status in its current state. Apart from these objections, it is fairly good. Rechze • (talk) 11:51, 3 Mar 2005 (GMT)
  2. I'm sorry, guys, but it just seems too plain to me. --Pacitalkia 21:34, 12 November 2005 (GMT)
  3. Have to back up the others in saying that it does not really stand out. It *is* a nice article, mind you, but it could use pictures and stuff. Or some other nifty... anything. The lists of etniticities are not very informative either, a bit long. This page has potential though if it gets a bit more work! --|Knoot|KNOOtalk 22:53, 12 November 2005 (GMT)
  4. Also opposed, for reasons previously stated. Jey 07:12 13 February 2006 (GMT)
  5. I agree with the comments above. It's a nice article, but it's pretty plain overall and doesnt stand out to me like a FA should. Praetonia 15:10, 14 February 2006 (GMT)
  6. Oppose—there’s nothing in it that really stands out from an average nation article, like Pacitalia does. —Commerce Heights (talk) 06:43, 7 April 2006 (GMT)
  7. I concur with everything aformentioned here. Veskaland 16:30, 9 April 2006 (GMT)

Neutral

  1. Rechze • (talk) 10:45, 9 Mar 2005 (GMT)
  2. While I'd like to vote yes, I can't see anything that really makes it stand out enough. If someone would kindly point out something truely original here, perhaps I'd change my view. Nanakaland 20:05, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)
  3. It's Good...but like Nanakaland said nothing makes it stand out to the point that it should be a featured article--Tetris L-Shaped Block 00:11, 10 August 2005 (GMT)
  4. It's an awesome article, but it's not feature material. This is sort of like what (in my opinion) most NSwiki pages should look like, except for those that go above and beyond to become features. If there was a graphical aspect to break up the text I'd support it. → Ceo\squawk 23:18, December 3, 2005 (GMT)
  5. Eh, seems a bit plain. Some interesting material, and I like the overall organization, but it deterioriates a bit, with the lists. Needs some work, but definite potential for a feature. Gruen2alk 09:40, 9 January 2006 (GMT)

Comments/Questions

  1. Rechze, could you perhaps specify which sections you believe are in need of work or should be reordered, so that Scolo can take your suggestions under advisement? 69.225.31.50 11:53, 8 Mar 2005 (GMT)
  2. For record, 69.225.31.50 is me. Wasn't logged in. Khen 11:56, 8 Mar 2005 (GMT)
I have done what I can, but further: a short summary of Scolopendran_History, in the history section could be useful. Moreover, the paragraphs I have made should be linked if not naturally, and I am not quite sure as to if this article could be considered comprehensive: covering all aspects of the topic, whether detailed or not. So I will defer a support vote. Rechze • (talk) 10:45, 9 Mar 2005 (GMT)
Retrieved from "http://archive.nswiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Scolopendra/Archive&oldid=217952"