Difference between revisions of "Talk:Swilatia"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Amongst many other examples found on the internet and various other resources of information.--[[User:Pinguinum|The Kingdom of Pinguinum]] 15:34, 7 November 2007 (GMT) | Amongst many other examples found on the internet and various other resources of information.--[[User:Pinguinum|The Kingdom of Pinguinum]] 15:34, 7 November 2007 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Actually, you don't need a mantling, supporter, or any of that other weirdery. Many coat of arms (ex. that of Poland) consist of only a shield. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oh, and I am fully aware that my country's coat of arms isn't a traditional coat of arms. I can still call it a coat of arms if I want to. --'''[[Swilatia|<font color="red">sw</font>]][[User:Swilatia|<font color="green">il</font>]][[User Talk: Swilatia|<font color= "yellow">at</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Swilatia|<font color="blue">ia</font>]]''' 22:02, 7 November 2007 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:02, 7 November 2007
By the way, coats of arms involve; a shield, mantling, supporters, a crest and other devices. Don't take my word for it though... http://www.woodlands-junior.kent.sch.uk/customs/questions/motto.html
Amongst many other examples found on the internet and various other resources of information.--The Kingdom of Pinguinum 15:34, 7 November 2007 (GMT)
Actually, you don't need a mantling, supporter, or any of that other weirdery. Many coat of arms (ex. that of Poland) consist of only a shield.
Oh, and I am fully aware that my country's coat of arms isn't a traditional coat of arms. I can still call it a coat of arms if I want to. --swilatia 22:02, 7 November 2007 (GMT)
