Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The inclusion tag was removed by 22 June 2005 on ~~~~~, as there was consensus to keep the article. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. Please start a new section to discuss the article. --Goobergunch|? 17:26, 22 Jun 2005 (GMT)

This article was posted for speedy deletion on 21:02, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC). It does not appear to meet the speedy deletion criteria, and is therefore moved to NSwiki:Deletion, for a discussion on deletion by consensus. This is a procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|? 16:55, 15 May 2005 (GMT)

• Keep, informative article. If outdated, it should be changed to address that instead of being deleted. --Goobergunch|? 16:58, 15 May 2005 (GMT)
• Keep, in agreement with Goober. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 18:40, 15 May 2005 (GMT)
• Keep. Rechze • (talk) 12:04, 27 May 2005 (GMT)
• Keep. I agree with Goober. It's a good article, I would prefer to see a remake other than a deletion on this. If it was shorter, my opinion would probably have been different. Pacitalia :: 07:17, 30 May 2005 (GMT).