Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tanah Burung"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
One, it's only '''one''' diocese that's doing this, and two, why the heck must ''I'' be singled out? ~Syskeyia
 
One, it's only '''one''' diocese that's doing this, and two, why the heck must ''I'' be singled out? ~Syskeyia
 +
 +
In the current edit, you're not singled out. I think we have an agreement on the text as it stands now. [[User:Tanah Burung|TB]]

Revision as of 20:17, 21 October 2004

Edit remark:
>Syskeyia
>It is a KNOWN FACT that the Catholic Church has TRADITIONALLY codemned homosexual relationships.
>My edits are neutral, stop trying to say homosexuality is OK by the Church.

For future reference, before you re-revert your edit again, start a discussion on the talk page instead. You do not resolve an issue by having an edit war on the nation page of someone else. I am not constantly editing in how atheists all hate Syskeyia and how they must be opressed, there ought to be a certain measure of respect on NSWiki.

The thing is, TB is in communion with HVS (the Catholic NS pope you conveniently ignore) and the HVS from NS is rather more liberal regarding homosexual relationships then the real-life pope (which does not even exist in NS!). Hence, Tanah Burung is in communion with the HVS Catholic Church. I think the reference in the article specifically to you being critical was quite enough of a concession to make.

Since you IGNORE HVS (for some rather trivial reasons beyond my understanding) it is really none of your business how these two players define their mutual relationship. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 23:40, 21 Oct 2004 (GMT)


I edited the remarks again. HVS is in there. :P Also, I said it was traditionally condemned by the Church, and that the issue has nonetheless generated much controversy within the Catholic communion. Or are you trying to single the Church in my country out?

Anyway, there is the remark, so there. :P --Syskeyia

In the interests of compromise, i'd be prepared to accept the "traditional Catholic teaching" line instead of the link singling out Syskeyia. But i want to be really clear: i am NOT claiming to be in communion with the real-life Holy See, which is what you edited in, Sys. This is a role-play in progress with the NS player Holy Vatican See, which i am fully prepared to see end in ex-communication. But at the moment the entry is factual. TB 00:02, 22 Oct 2004 (GMT)


Note to self: see Talk page before reverting edits *smacks self and reverts own edit* --Goobergunch|? 00:05, 22 Oct 2004 (GMT)


Hmm, that looks odd. In the intersts of clarity, that was 2 paragraphs from Sys and one from me. Sys, pls. sign your remarks with 4 tildes (~) so we know who said what, or people will think i'm you! TB 00:05, 22 Oct 2004 (GMT)

One, it's only one diocese that's doing this, and two, why the heck must I be singled out? ~Syskeyia

In the current edit, you're not singled out. I think we have an agreement on the text as it stands now. TB