Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Fourth Holy Reich"

Revision as of 17:32, 10 December 2006

Oh boy, I can see by the vandalism that this guy seriously pissed some NSers off. (unsigned comment)

I nominate this article for deletion. It's never had any real content by the nation, I think the nation has been deleted, and I'm pretty sure the nation was a two-bit troll that doesn't need a historic article. Ceoran_ta 03:43, 10 December 2006 (GMT)

Delete, the nation is gone now. --swilatia 12:35, 10 December 2006 (GMT)

I'm a tad bit hesitant about deleting a nation's article, if it's reasonably long, even if that nation no longer exists. And the fact that an article has been vandalised is no reason to delete it. But in this particular case, I'd be inclined to agree that having an article on this DEATed nation doesn't contribute very much to the wiki. UNLESS the nation's creator shows himself to be active in constructively editing this article (in which case I can see little justification in deleting it, repugnant as the ideology behind this nation unquestionably is). Aridd 13:19, 10 December 2006 (GMT)

I think it would be wise to remove the nation's article. As previously stated, it really doesn't add much to the community.

The user is a notorious troll. boldly promoting the twisted ideology.

I'm no fan of censorship, but this user has not been a constructive member of the community let alone humanity. It espouses a terrible, hateful way of thinking.

The internet, being a truly human project, has no place for the hateful life-negating presence that this user's entry implies.

I wrote it

I wrote the original article, what you see now. The NSer, the Fourth Holy Reich, did something too anger the NS moderaters, and hes gone now. Seeing this makes me the author of the article, I humbly request deletion. That dispicable individual does not deserve a wiki page. He deleted everything at one point, and wrote "nope". I am the author, the article is mine, and I wish for it too be deleted.