Talk:USSR-ADN Trial/Text

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Deletion discussion

This discussion is now closed. The inclusion tag was removed by 15 May 2005 on ~~~~~, with no consensus to delete the article achieved. The debate below serves as a record and should not be edited, as it is no longer live. Please start a new section to discuss the article. --Goobergunch|? 16:27, 15 May 2005 (GMT)

Added to NSwiki:Deletion on 00:27, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT). Procedural nomination. --Goobergunch|?

This page is 56 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32KB. It also totally lacks any wiki links to other articles.

In addition, I'm quite sure that this document has been posted somewhere on the forums (be they NationStates or offsite) where this thing can easily be linked to instead of slowing down the wiki as per standing wiki policy.-- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 17:39, 30 Dec 2004 (GMT)

  • Agreed. Rechze(talk) 10:06, 13 Jan 2005 (GMT)
  • Not really - Yet this was a major turning point in NS for many, and did change the ADN and NPO, who were the two major powers at the time. (unsigned edit by 68.56.172.224)
    • But is it available externally? Rechze(talk) 03:36, 22 Jan 2005 (GMT)
  • Concur with deletion. → Fris Θtalk 19:13, 22 Jan 2005 (GMT)
  • Considering it is detailed elsewhere, and is copied here as a copious block of unsectioned, undivided and purely linear text, besides the space it consumes, this article strikes me as Wiki-unfriendly on the user level as well. To be quite frank, anyone wanting to refer to this would probably look at the lack of divisions and think "This'll take me ages, why bother?" Concur. IdioC- エドの狂いtalk 21:19, 22 Jan 2005 (GMT)

It is not available to the public anywhere else. The only other place is the USSR forums or ADN forums, both have to be registered, approved, and not IP banned.(unsigned edit by 68.56.172.224)

My sentiment lays neutral now then. Rechze(talk) 06:28, 8 Feb 2005 (GMT)
  • Note that is is inaccessible on the ADN forum because this decision was on the old (s3) forums, which are no longer open to anybody except Pope Hope and maybe another admin or two. However, source material such as this really isn't appropriate for the wiki, so I'm not going to vote yea or nay here. --Goobergunch|? 19:26, 8 Feb 2005 (GMT)
    • I'd say keep it, then. However, it needs to be wikified if kept, adding links and headings. ~ Nanakaland 19:45, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)