Difference between revisions of "Talk:United Elias"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Since [[User:195.93.21.69]] has repeatedly blanked large swaths of text from this article without offering any explanation whatsoever on any talk pages I request that said user offer some kind of explanation before editing the article again . [[User:John|John]] 16:38, 5 May 2007 (GMT) | Since [[User:195.93.21.69]] has repeatedly blanked large swaths of text from this article without offering any explanation whatsoever on any talk pages I request that said user offer some kind of explanation before editing the article again . [[User:John|John]] 16:38, 5 May 2007 (GMT) | ||
| − | This page causes considerable ambiguity, contains some offensive material and is also out of date so there is no reason why it should not be deleted. | + | This page causes considerable ambiguity, contains some offensive material and is also out of date so there is no reason why it should not be deleted.-Unsigned comment left by [[User:64.12.116.67]] |
| + | |||
| + | Please point out the specific examples of offensive material, and explain why it is offensive before editing the article [[User:John|John]] 16:45, 13 May 2007 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 12:45, 13 May 2007
I have reverted the blanking of this article since it has multiple editors, has substantial information, and was created by a logged in user. It is however an article on a nation which no longer exists, which may be the reason it was blanked by the anonymous ip; but I think this article should not be blanked/deleted and instead turned into a historic nation article since United Elias was around for many years and had interaction with many different nations. John 17:14, 28 April 2007 (GMT)
Since User:195.93.21.69 has repeatedly blanked large swaths of text from this article without offering any explanation whatsoever on any talk pages I request that said user offer some kind of explanation before editing the article again . John 16:38, 5 May 2007 (GMT)
This page causes considerable ambiguity, contains some offensive material and is also out of date so there is no reason why it should not be deleted.-Unsigned comment left by User:64.12.116.67
Please point out the specific examples of offensive material, and explain why it is offensive before editing the article John 16:45, 13 May 2007 (GMT)
