Talk:World Cup Committee

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

List revert

Is there a reason why my edit was reverted? I don’t see anything wrong with it. —Commerce Heights (talk) 20:12, 18 February 2006 (GMT)

From the talk in #sport yesterday morning, you were the only one. Bedi beat me to the revert, apparently, though I do like the post facto edit you made. Legalese 10:43, 19 February 2006 (GMT)

This is a rather late (and perhaps irrelevant) response, but it was because you had "fixed" the lists in a half-assed way. The current version is superior to both the original and your first version. ;) —Bedistan 05:41, 20 February 2006 (GMT)

Well, I’d argue that the current version is effectively identical to my first version, but I don’t see much point. :P —Commerce Heights (talk) 03:58, 21 February 2006 (GMT)


French Guard

Unless someone else has a problem with it, I will include it. LE continually reverts it. Spaam 05:35, 13 July 2006 (GMT)

And I will continue to do so. My reasons are clear - it is not official, and non-notable. It may deserve a mention as an RP event, but not in the President's section. Like I suggested, a subsection or even a spot in any article about Spaamanian football. LE (WP) | Talk 05:41, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
And I will continue to revert it until someone other than LE has a problem with it. Spaam 05:41, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
You were never voted as Vice-Vice President of the EWCC. There is no such position. LE (WP) | Talk 05:42, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
Again, until anyone else has a problem. Besides, he is not Spaamanian. Any nation can use him. Spaam 05:46, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
The position is non-existant. There is no need for a character to fill it. End-of-story. LE (WP) | Talk 05:49, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
Going by your logic, I could then argue we should keep it out of the article until anyone else supports such an inclusion. And don't even bother asking those on #sport, because I'll know if they really mean it, or if you asked. LE (WP) | Talk 05:50, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
As usual, whatever you say is ignored. Spaam 05:52, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
WHY in the name of the almighty Tux are y'all making such a fuss about this one sentence. Spaam asked me for a comment, here it is: Grow up! Rejistania 06:01, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
Do not make personal attacks. LE (WP) | Talk 07:27, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
Oh boy. Until a Spaam candidate comes third in a Presidential election and can theoretically be named a Vice-Vice President, I don't agree with it being mentioned in this article. If anyone would be a VVP it would actually be a Vilitan, as Vil is the only other person to have received a nomination in the last election besides myself and Legal. A Spaam representative on the committee, fine, but nowhere is there even a vague-but-kinda-comical IC link to the Presidency. Starblaydia 18:36, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
Point is, he IS NOT Spaamanian. Not sure what he is (prolly Oliverrian cos he's a frenchy). Thing is, he's a comical character that can be used by anyone and does not belong to anyone, especially not me. Spaam 04:29, 14 July 2006 (GMT)
Actually, given that his lines were taken directly from the Holy Grail, I'd say that the character belongs to John Cleese, the actor who played the original character in the first place and in fact most likely wrote the lines for said character. That said, several people disagree with the inclusion of such a plagaristic "character" as part of the official article and the character itself really adds nothing to the post in question (All the dialogue being ripped directly from the original script). As a completely neutral and indifferent party, I advise leaving out any references to the "vice-vice-president". Nightbane 09:53, 14 July 2006 (GMT)
Fair point. It will stay out. Spaam 10:39, 15 July 2006 (GMT)