Difference between revisions of "Talk:World Cup Committee"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(French Guard)
m
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
::::As usual, whatever you say is ignored.  [[User:Spaam|Spaam]] 05:52, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
 
::::As usual, whatever you say is ignored.  [[User:Spaam|Spaam]] 05:52, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
 +
 +
::::WHY in the name of the almighty Tux are y'all making such a fuss about this one sentence. Spaam asked me for a comment, here it is: Grow up! [[User:Rejistania|Rejistania]] 06:01, 13 July 2006 (GMT)

Revision as of 02:01, 13 July 2006

List revert

Is there a reason why my edit was reverted? I don’t see anything wrong with it. —Commerce Heights (talk) 20:12, 18 February 2006 (GMT)

From the talk in #sport yesterday morning, you were the only one. Bedi beat me to the revert, apparently, though I do like the post facto edit you made. Legalese 10:43, 19 February 2006 (GMT)

This is a rather late (and perhaps irrelevant) response, but it was because you had "fixed" the lists in a half-assed way. The current version is superior to both the original and your first version. ;) —Bedistan 05:41, 20 February 2006 (GMT)

Well, I’d argue that the current version is effectively identical to my first version, but I don’t see much point. :P —Commerce Heights (talk) 03:58, 21 February 2006 (GMT)


French Guard

Unless someone else has a problem with it, I will include it. LE continually reverts it. Spaam 05:35, 13 July 2006 (GMT)

And I will continue to do so. My reasons are clear - it is not official, and non-notable. It may deserve a mention as an RP event, but not in the President's section. Like I suggested, a subsection or even a spot in any article about Spaamanian football. LE (WP) | Talk 05:41, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
And I will continue to revert it until someone other than LE has a problem with it. Spaam 05:41, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
You were never voted as Vice-Vice President of the EWCC. There is no such position. LE (WP) | Talk 05:42, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
Again, until anyone else has a problem. Besides, he is not Spaamanian. Any nation can use him. Spaam 05:46, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
The position is non-existant. There is no need for a character to fill it. End-of-story. LE (WP) | Talk 05:49, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
Going by your logic, I could then argue we should keep it out of the article until anyone else supports such an inclusion. And don't even bother asking those on #sport, because I'll know if they really mean it, or if you asked. LE (WP) | Talk 05:50, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
As usual, whatever you say is ignored. Spaam 05:52, 13 July 2006 (GMT)
WHY in the name of the almighty Tux are y'all making such a fuss about this one sentence. Spaam asked me for a comment, here it is: Grow up! Rejistania 06:01, 13 July 2006 (GMT)