Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Image"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since many pages have images on them on this template, I protected it, so that it does not get vandalized. --'''[[Swilatia|<font color="red">sw</font>]][[User:Swilatia|<font color="green">il</font>]][[User Talk: Swilatia|<font color= "yellow">at</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Swilatia|<font color="blue">ia</font>]]''' 12:46, 31 March 2006 (GMT) | Since many pages have images on them on this template, I protected it, so that it does not get vandalized. --'''[[Swilatia|<font color="red">sw</font>]][[User:Swilatia|<font color="green">il</font>]][[User Talk: Swilatia|<font color= "yellow">at</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Swilatia|<font color="blue">ia</font>]]''' 12:46, 31 March 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Reverse?== | ||
I wouldn't mind a revert to the older variant of the template. The new one just entirely screws up the legend instead of automaticly breaking it up into lines. As such, while wide pictures are nice and cosy, not so wide ones find themselves with huge single-line legends beneath them that entirely mess up the article. [[User:Jester|Jester]] 17:18, 2 December 2006 (GMT) | I wouldn't mind a revert to the older variant of the template. The new one just entirely screws up the legend instead of automaticly breaking it up into lines. As such, while wide pictures are nice and cosy, not so wide ones find themselves with huge single-line legends beneath them that entirely mess up the article. [[User:Jester|Jester]] 17:18, 2 December 2006 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 13:19, 2 December 2006
Since many pages have images on them on this template, I protected it, so that it does not get vandalized. --swilatia 12:46, 31 March 2006 (GMT)
Reverse?
I wouldn't mind a revert to the older variant of the template. The new one just entirely screws up the legend instead of automaticly breaking it up into lines. As such, while wide pictures are nice and cosy, not so wide ones find themselves with huge single-line legends beneath them that entirely mess up the article. Jester 17:18, 2 December 2006 (GMT)
