User talk:207.237.104.148

My earlier edits were taken down repeatedly, so we will all be removing these posts unless they follow the neutrality that is required.

Eireann Shamrock

cheers, thanks :)

I'd sign up but I haven't had the time and was unfamiliar with the format. All I know is I was directed to this page which contained many errors so I've tried to correct them. I've never glorified "eireann shamrock", merely fixed the extremely negative summary that you allowed to act as his portrayal. I am puzzled as to why you didn't write similiar remarks to the original "Eireann shamrock" poster that wrote an extreme portrayal that is contrary to your NPOV standard -- the original message about "eireann shamrock" clearly defied your standard, so why was this person held to a different standard? People have a right to set the record straight in the quest for truth, perhaps I wouldn't have had to post had the original not been so slanderous and one sided.

Haven't meant to cause a bother but it's offensive to see erroneous comments continually up on this site that I get chastised for correcting. I'm trying to be fair and balanced and shall keep in mind your comments. thanks!

freewebs

Cheers, thanks couldn't find a way to get that pic up, will try harder :)

User comments

If you want to keep your user talk page succinct, instead of deleting other people's comments, why not make archive pages - this will seem more as if you're acknowledging what people are saying instead of possibly deleting them so that people have to look back through the history in order to see what your assertions are intending for.

Also, quoting and replying on the talk page of the intended message recipient is the standard practise, is it not? You'd probably be many times as likely to get a reply that way.IdioC- エドの狂いtalk 18:34, 10 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Ireland

Please don't alter the Infobox and the WFE to express political disagreement with a regional government. The best way to note that the rightful Delegate and Forum should be elsewhere is as a new section within the article; the Infobox and WFE, however, should express the current situation in the region. --Goobergunch|? 23:32, 14 Jan 2005 (GMT)

If you're not going to respond to this, consider it your last warning. --Goobergunch|? 17:36, 16 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Warned of what, sorry don't follow what you are getting at.

This style of editing:http://archive.nswiki.org/index.php?title=Ireland&diff=30261&oldid=30250 Rechze • (talk) 00:49, 19 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Contraversial edits

If you are contemplating making an edit that maybe could even be just slightly contraversial, you could see if it is acceptable to the community by leaving a message about it on the talk page of the article, and then waiting for consensus before the edit is made. That way you can save having the edits reverted after you have done them if they are deemed innapropriate. It would probably make it easier. Regards, Rechze • (talk) 02:42, 23 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Eireann_Shamrock edits

If you wish for any hope of these edits eventuating, then you must discuss and explain them first on the talk page of the article. I hope that your consider. Rechze • (talk) 09:40, 30 Jan 2005 (GMT)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify him/her. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.