User talk:207.72.66.5

Hi there. I noticed your contribution, Atheism, has no content relating to NationStates nor any links to the page. Rather than turning NSwiki into Wikipedia Jr., we prefer to link to Wikipedia itself. If you have no NS content to add, I'd really appreciate you going to the that page and replacing the content with this {{delete}} notice. Thanks. → Fris Θtalk 16:43, 8 Nov 2004 (GMT)

Your comment on User talk:Frisbeeteria

You may want to look over Wikipedia:No personal attacks - it applies to this wiki as well. --Goobergunch|? 16:57, 15 Nov 2004 (GMT)

In addition, I am responsible for expanding this entry a lot, not Frisbeetaria. I am not sure what you are trying to say about 'effect' in your message to Frisbeetaria, but religion generally implies a deistic belief. This is just what atheism is not. As for your second comment: it is not true in Nationstates that all atheist nations are communist. Take a look, for example, at the nation of Constantinopolis. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 17:24, 15 Nov 2004 (GMT)

The entire content of this page when I made my comment was:

"Atheism: Atheism is the complete lack of religion, it is acknowledging that there is no force or power other than the physical"

Not only is this an incomplete definition, it contains no NS content of any sort. As this is the NSwiki, absence of NationStates content is criteria for deletion. Every other religion page is held to the same standard as well. The only change I made to the page was to correct the category from Religion to Religions. No one, in any of the following edits I have seen, has denied that atheism belongs in the Religions category.

Your comment was rude, unnecessary, and factually incorrect. It also came, unsigned, from the anonymity of an IP address, which adds to the level of rudeness. I suggest you be more diligent in your research of who said what and to whom before you start tossing accusations about. → Fris Θtalk 17:39, 15 Nov 2004 (GMT)

i only attacked him because he attacked my post and therefore attacked me, whos to define where personal attacks begin and article criticism stops.

There is a difference between pointing out NSwiki policy and "attacking" your post. The original post had no NS content. I pointed that out. I invited you to add NS content or request deletion. The original post and the original content are both present on this page, and I don't think anyone but you sees it as an attack.

"whos to define where personal attacks begin and article criticism stops" - that would be the job of the wiki community, as enforced by the NSwiki sysops. Three of the four sysops responded on this page. Can it be any clearer than that?

This entire argument is now moot anyway, as other members of the wiki community have turned the article into a genuine NationStates article on atheism. → Fris Θtalk 17:16, 17 Nov 2004 (GMT)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify him/her. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.