Difference between revisions of "User talk:Newfoundcanada"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
(National Sovereignty)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
=== National Sovereignty  ===
 
=== National Sovereignty  ===
 +
National Sovereignty is a tricky issue. I belive that resolutions should generaly be in one of 3 catagories for me to support them being an international issue.
 +
*For some reason such things are much more effective if alot of people do it then just one nation. For example enviromental issues and criminal databases.
 +
*A very broad idea that prohibits things that are nessasary but let's nations choose on many issues inside it.
 +
*Alot of significant human rights. Of course not everyone.
  
 
=== Gay/lesbian rights ===
 
=== Gay/lesbian rights ===

Revision as of 13:06, 26 June 2006

The nation of NewfoundCanada is an active UN nation. It almost never does roleplay, but is very active in UN affairs. It is a very proud member of the Aberdeen region.

Work in Aberdeen

Newfoundcanada is a very loyal member of Aberdeen and has been in it since joining nationstates. NewfoundCanada was recruited by a Telegram campain by the aberdeen minister of immigration PGrier. NewfoundCanada has the two official jobs at the current momment in aberdeen

  • Foregein ambassador to Futaba Aoi
  • Workind in the ministry of immigration as a recruiter.


Work in the UN

NewfoundCanada is the orginal author of the prison quality draft. This is still in the draft stage but has been in it for about 20 days so far. It has been changed exstensivly over this period though the orginal points are basicaly the same, most have been entirly re-written.

Political Views

NewfoundCanada's political views are not reflected by his nation. The nation is a extremly concervative one while his views are liberal. The following catagories will state his views on each subject. Remember these are the nations views, but it does have a grasp on Politics and what to push and what not to.

National Sovereignty

National Sovereignty is a tricky issue. I belive that resolutions should generaly be in one of 3 catagories for me to support them being an international issue.

  • For some reason such things are much more effective if alot of people do it then just one nation. For example enviromental issues and criminal databases.
  • A very broad idea that prohibits things that are nessasary but let's nations choose on many issues inside it.
  • Alot of significant human rights. Of course not everyone.

Gay/lesbian rights

For treating them like a married couple. Newfoundcanada also does not belive in forcing any person who has a legal ability to marry people to marry gay couples.

Concription

Against because forcing people to join a war they do not want to fight is wrong. People should get the option of wether or not they are going to fight in a war. Also concription lowers moral.

Abortion

Euthanasia

For allowing people to choose for themselves. They should be in full mental health and in extreme pain. If they do not have the mental capacity to choose themselves then others should only be allowed to choose in some special cases.

Gun ownership

Against gun ownership beliving it does not save nearly as many people as it kills.