Difference between revisions of "Ban Chemical Weapons"
Mikitivity (Talk | contribs) m (→Resolution Text) |
Mikitivity (Talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Resolution Text== | ==Resolution Text== | ||
+ | <center>[http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/page=UN_past_resolutions/start=106 UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTION #107]</center> | ||
+ | <center><big>''' Ban Chemical Weapons '''</big></center> | ||
+ | <center> A resolution to slash worldwide military spending. </center> | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | {| Align="center" border="0" cellpadding="5" width="66%" style="margin-left:0.5em;"|- | ||
+ | ! align="right" | Category: | ||
+ | | Global Disarmament | ||
+ | ! align="right" | Strength: | ||
+ | | Significant | ||
+ | ! align="right" | Proposed By: | ||
+ | | Mayakovskia | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | ---- | ||
The United Nations, | The United Nations, |
Latest revision as of 21:16, 5 August 2006
Resolution Text
Category: | Global Disarmament | Strength: | Significant | Proposed By: | Mayakovskia |
---|
The United Nations,
NOTING the positive consequences of Resolution 16, "Elimination of Bio Weapons", to global security and human welfare;
NOTING ALSO the precedents set by the following Resolutions: 40 (Banning the use of Landmines); 51 (Children in War); 57 (Reduce Black Market Arms Sales); 75 (The Nuclear Terrorism Act); 83 (The Eon Convention on Genocide); and 92 (Humanitarian Intervention) and their positive contributions to global security and human welfare;
REGRETTING that, although there are specific laws banning the trafficking and use of biological and nuclear weapons, there are as yet no such laws on chemical weapons;
BELIEVING that the world should be free of chemical weapons, as it now is of biological weapons;
RESOLVES to ban all production and trafficking in chemical weapons, and to take steps towards the ultimate decommissioning of all chemical weapons currently in existence.
- Votes For: 10,006
- Votes Against: 7,109
- Implemented: Wed Jun 15 2005
- Repealed: Wed Sep 7 2005