Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rejistanian"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
#I am the writer of this article and would like to see it as FAC. However I will not vote for myself :) ~ [[User:Rejistania|Rejistania]] 22:21, 28 Dec 2004 (GMT) | #I am the writer of this article and would like to see it as FAC. However I will not vote for myself :) ~ [[User:Rejistania|Rejistania]] 22:21, 28 Dec 2004 (GMT) | ||
| − | #While I feel that the article is well-written, I believe it can be improved and would like to see it as a future FAC, but not right now. - [[User:Liverpool England|Liverpool England]]|[[ | + | #While I feel that the article is well-written, I believe it can be improved and would like to see it as a future FAC, but not right now. - [[User:Liverpool England|Liverpool England]]|[[User_Talk:Liverpool England|My Talk page]] 05:01, 30 Dec 2004 (GMT) |
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
Revision as of 01:01, 30 December 2004
Rejistanian FAC Vote (1/0/2)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ~~~~ and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- I fully support this as the 'nominator'. I believe this is a fascinating article that gives an easy insight into the language that is Rejistanian. I believe this would make a great featured article as it tells you what you want to know without getting boring. I believe this article shows great skill in portraying the Rejistanian language TBF 21:19, 28 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Oppose
Neutral
- I am the writer of this article and would like to see it as FAC. However I will not vote for myself :) ~ Rejistania 22:21, 28 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- While I feel that the article is well-written, I believe it can be improved and would like to see it as a future FAC, but not right now. - Liverpool England|My Talk page 05:01, 30 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Comments/Questions
