Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Feedback"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I agree. If people want to leave feedback there's the discussion page. I don't see the point in "panhandling" for feedback with a template.--[[User:Pantocratoria|Pantocratoria]] 04:48, 7 November 2006 (GMT) | :I agree. If people want to leave feedback there's the discussion page. I don't see the point in "panhandling" for feedback with a template.--[[User:Pantocratoria|Pantocratoria]] 04:48, 7 November 2006 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I don't see any harm in it. It simply means that the article's author will be specially receptive to feedback, which should encourage giving it. '''Keep'''. [[User:Aridd|Aridd]] 14:13, 7 November 2006 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 10:13, 7 November 2006
I'm nominating this for deletion because, well, of course the authors want constructive feedback! It's a wiki! Anyone can march right in and improve the article. Plus, this makes articles look ugly. Ceoranta 02:11, 7 November 2006 (GMT)
- I agree. If people want to leave feedback there's the discussion page. I don't see the point in "panhandling" for feedback with a template.--Pantocratoria 04:48, 7 November 2006 (GMT)
- I don't see any harm in it. It simply means that the article's author will be specially receptive to feedback, which should encourage giving it. Keep. Aridd 14:13, 7 November 2006 (GMT)
