Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hogsweat-Scandavian War"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I'm sorry, but I don't have the ego to talk about myself in the third person. Furthermore, no point of view but first felt right when I wrote that particular section, which I viewed as rather important to put in given some of the comments that have directed at me about the war. Also, while I did indentify myself, it would have been silly and somewhat misleading not to have done so, I think you will find that if you actually speak to Hogsweat he will vouche for its neutrality and honesty. That he hasn't done so is all that really needs to be said, your minor nit notwithstanding. | I'm sorry, but I don't have the ego to talk about myself in the third person. Furthermore, no point of view but first felt right when I wrote that particular section, which I viewed as rather important to put in given some of the comments that have directed at me about the war. Also, while I did indentify myself, it would have been silly and somewhat misleading not to have done so, I think you will find that if you actually speak to Hogsweat he will vouche for its neutrality and honesty. That he hasn't done so is all that really needs to be said, your minor nit notwithstanding. | ||
| − | [[User:Scandavian States | + | [[User:Scandavian States]] • [[User talk:Scandavian States(talk)]] 09:26, 20 Jan 2005 (EST) |
Revision as of 22:30, 20 January 2005
- "I (Scandavian States) [...]"
I think this says all. A first person account, and needs to be adjusted as is appropriate in time. Rechze • (talk) 09:09, 20 Jan 2005 (GMT)
I'm sorry, but I don't have the ego to talk about myself in the third person. Furthermore, no point of view but first felt right when I wrote that particular section, which I viewed as rather important to put in given some of the comments that have directed at me about the war. Also, while I did indentify myself, it would have been silly and somewhat misleading not to have done so, I think you will find that if you actually speak to Hogsweat he will vouche for its neutrality and honesty. That he hasn't done so is all that really needs to be said, your minor nit notwithstanding.
User:Scandavian States • User talk:Scandavian States(talk) 09:26, 20 Jan 2005 (EST)
