Difference between revisions of "Anti-UN"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Frisbeeteria (Talk | contribs) m |
(NPOV. criticism ---> see article) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The costs associated with UN membership include threats to [[Wikipedia:sovereignty|sovereignty]], undesired changes to [[national statistics]] ''(as imposed by the [[Compliance Ministry]])'', and a wide variety of philosophical differences. | The costs associated with UN membership include threats to [[Wikipedia:sovereignty|sovereignty]], undesired changes to [[national statistics]] ''(as imposed by the [[Compliance Ministry]])'', and a wide variety of philosophical differences. | ||
| − | Some see the UN as an attempt to impose a [[world government]] over the entire collection of NationStates. This theory | + | Some see the UN as an attempt to impose a [[world government]] over the entire collection of NationStates. This theory is dismissed by its opponents by pointing to the statistics that show that only about one-third of all nations are in fact UN members. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
== Additional Information == | == Additional Information == | ||
Revision as of 09:46, 15 October 2004
There are always nations who take an Anti-UN position in NationStates. These nations have decided that the potential benefits gained from UN membership (such as invasion play, proposal submitting and approving, etc.) are not worth the costs.
The costs associated with UN membership include threats to sovereignty, undesired changes to national statistics (as imposed by the Compliance Ministry), and a wide variety of philosophical differences.
Some see the UN as an attempt to impose a world government over the entire collection of NationStates. This theory is dismissed by its opponents by pointing to the statistics that show that only about one-third of all nations are in fact UN members.
