Difference between revisions of "Anti-UN"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
 
m
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}
 +
 +
 +
== Additional Information ==
 +
* [http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=351794 The Official '''I hate the UN''' thread]
  
 
[[Category:United Nations]][[Category:Gameplaying]]
 
[[Category:United Nations]][[Category:Gameplaying]]

Revision as of 18:34, 13 October 2004

There are always nations who take an Anti-UN position in NationStates. These nations have decided that the potential benefits gained from UN membership (such as invasion play, proposal submitting and approving, etc.) are not worth the costs.

The costs associated with UN membership include threats to sovereignty, undesired changes to national statistics (as imposed by the Compliance Ministry), and a wide variety of philosophical differences.

Some see the UN as an attempt to impose a world government over the entire collection of NationStates. This theory can usually be dismissed by pointing to the statistics that show that only about one-third of all nations are in fact UN members. Given the ease by which nations may resign from the UN, building a uniform World Government structure will be impossible to accomplish.


This article is a stub. You can help NSwiki by improving it.


Additional Information