Difference between revisions of "Freedom of Assembly"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Resolution history==
 
==Resolution history==
 
===Telegram campaign===
 
===Telegram campaign===
The Freedom of Assembly proposal was first submitted to the proposal queue in mid-August 2006. The proposal did not go through any significant changes. Twice, its sponsoring nation, Mikitivity, carpetted hundreds of UN Delegates with [[telegrams]] seeking support. After 7 submissions to the proposal queue, the proposal established [[quorum]] on Mon Sep 25 2006.
+
The Freedom of Assembly proposal was first submitted to the proposal queue in mid-August 2006. The proposal did not go through any significant changes. Twice, its sponsoring nation, Mikitivity, carpetted hundreds of UN Delegates with [[telegram]]s seeking support. After 7 submissions to the proposal queue, the proposal established [[quorum]] on Mon Sep 25 2006.
  
 
==Resolution text==
 
==Resolution text==
  
 
==Voting analysis==
 
==Voting analysis==
A poll was attached to the UN Floor Debate thread, asking [[UN Delegate]s, UN Members, and Non-UN Members if they supported, opposed, or were indifferent to the resolution.
+
A poll was attached to the UN Floor Debate thread, asking [[UN Delegate]]s, UN Members, and Non-UN Members if they supported, opposed, or were indifferent to the resolution.
  
 
==Additional materials==
 
==Additional materials==

Revision as of 14:52, 30 September 2006

Resolution history

Telegram campaign

The Freedom of Assembly proposal was first submitted to the proposal queue in mid-August 2006. The proposal did not go through any significant changes. Twice, its sponsoring nation, Mikitivity, carpetted hundreds of UN Delegates with telegrams seeking support. After 7 submissions to the proposal queue, the proposal established quorum on Mon Sep 25 2006.

Resolution text

Voting analysis

A poll was attached to the UN Floor Debate thread, asking UN Delegates, UN Members, and Non-UN Members if they supported, opposed, or were indifferent to the resolution.

Additional materials