Difference between revisions of "Repeal "Fair Sentencing Act""
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{Resolution| colour= #FFFFFF | resnumber= | linknumber= | category= Repeal | author= [[Imperfectia]] | Strengthorsubcategory= Repeals | strength= [[Fair Sentencing Act]] | status= '''Failed'''| date= | vote1=5517 | vote2=5157 }} | |
| − | + | ===Description:=== | |
| − | + | ||
| − | {| | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | ''' | + | |
UN Resolution #180: Fair Sentencing Act (Category: The Furtherment of Democracy; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void. | UN Resolution #180: Fair Sentencing Act (Category: The Furtherment of Democracy; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void. | ||
| − | '''Argument | + | '''Argument''': |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | The United Nations,<br> | ||
<b>AFFIRMING</b> that due to different circumstances different criminals may warrant different sentences for the same crime and such each case should be judged individually, and; | <b>AFFIRMING</b> that due to different circumstances different criminals may warrant different sentences for the same crime and such each case should be judged individually, and; | ||
Latest revision as of 08:39, 11 January 2007
| FAILED: Repeal "Fair Sentencing Act"
| |
|---|---|
| Category: | Repeal |
| Proposed By: | Imperfectia |
| Repeals: | Fair Sentencing Act |
| Status: | Failed |
| Adopted: | |
| Votes For: | 5517 |
| Votes Against: | 5157 |
Description:
UN Resolution #180: Fair Sentencing Act (Category: The Furtherment of Democracy; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Argument:
The United Nations,
AFFIRMING that due to different circumstances different criminals may warrant different sentences for the same crime and such each case should be judged individually, and;
COMMENDING UN#180 in its attempts to encourage member states to provide oversight to their judicial systems to examine trial and sentencing practices, however;
CONCERNED that the second article gives nations the license to use capital punishment too freely;
CONCERNED that individual states may use capital punishment for ANY offense they so choose including, but not limited to shoplifting, illegal drug possession, trespassing, and adultery;
BELIEVING that an internationally recognized standard practice regarding the use of capital punishment is in every member nation’s best interest in order to keep the peace;
HEREBY repeals UN #180, “Fair Sentencing Act”
- Votes For: 5,517
- Votes Against: 5,157
