|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | So, what do the people who look at this page think? I would appreciate all comments, and critisism, constructive or not. Thank you. | | So, what do the people who look at this page think? I would appreciate all comments, and critisism, constructive or not. Thank you. |
| | | | |
| − | <h3> {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (1/1/5) </h3>
| + | ==NEWS== |
| − | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.''
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | '''Support'''
| + | *December 30, 2006 |
| − | # Of course, I totally support myself. All comments are appreciated and all suggestions are taken to heart and considered. Thanks so much, guys and gals. [[User:Asgarnieu|Asgarnieu]] 01:20, 15 October 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | '''Oppose'''
| + | :Officially dropped out of the Featured Article race. Just too much work. I like my page the way it is. There. |
| − | #A bit too listy for my liking. [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 04:54, 28 November 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Neutral'''
| + | |
| − | # You're in an odd place for an article - I suppose it's right to say you're "on the brink". On the one hand, if you add more content you'll just have to siphon most of the big sections off into separate articles to avoid hampering size regulations, but right now your content is insufficient to demand so many subcategories in your article. Work on the content, develop the sections more and add secondary items to supplement textual data. Good start. (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 05:05, 13 October 2006 (GMT) >> '''A bit better, but it's still just all text. Content's still in the ''okay'' range. I'm still neutral.''' (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 03:06, 26 October 2006 (GMT) >> '''Still neutral - it's still mostly lists and stuff. Try shortening or removing some of that stuff as well.''' (( [[User:Pacitalia|<font color="navy">Paci</font>]][[User_talk:Pacitalia|<font color="green">'''talk'''</font>]][[User:Pacitalia|<font color="red">ia</font>]] )) <small>Time sent:</small> 18:39, 11 November 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | # I agree. There's a lot of ''basic'' information, but I would recommend you fleshing some of it out and developing the rest in seperate articles. Also, the introductory paragraph is... ahem, questionable in terms of NPOV. [[User:Aridd|Aridd]] 23:45, 14 October 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | # Would almost support it, but a few long sections is better then loads of short ones, so those should be extended, and, per Ariddia, the introduction may be POV. --'''[[Swilatia|<font color="red">sw</font>]][[User:Swilatia|<font color="green">il</font>]][[User Talk: Swilatia|<font color= "yellow">at</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Swilatia|<font color="blue">ia</font>]]''' 11:34, 17 October 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | #Some nice stuff - the templates, for example, and infobox - but the main article is a bit listy. I think it needs more content. [[Special:Contributions/Gruenberg2|<font color="blue">~</font>]][[User:Gruenberg2|<font color="green">Gruen</font>]][[User talk:Gruenberg2|<font color="red">2alk</font>]] 14:59, 31 October 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | #It's a good article, certainly, but not something I'd recommend to be featured. It just doesn't stand out from the crowd enough. Good yes, featured no. - [[User:Starblaydia|Starblaydia]] 18:43, 28 November 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Comments/Questions'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ''Only registered users may vote. The following vote was moved from support:''
| + | |
| − | #[[User:69.92.237.2|69.92.237.2]] 21:21, 28 September 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Fix ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | O.K., I fixed the introductory paragraph, and I do believe that I'll start on fixing a few sections. Thanks for the input, folks. [[User:Asgarnieu|Asgarnieu]] 21:08, 17 October 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == More "Fix" ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I fixed a few sub-sections to place them into one. Hopefully, that will fulfill the suggestions made. Thanks. [[User:Asgarnieu|Asgarnieu]] 02:21, 26 October 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == New Additions ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | OK, I added some more pictures to combat the ominous boringness that hung around it, and shortened and deleted some sections/sub-sections. Enjoy... [[User:Asgarnieu|Asgarnieu]] 04:31, 11 November 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == New Changes ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I changed around the Federal Government Agencies sub-section and made it a little more user-friendly.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == ... ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I removed the links on the bottom to conserve space and keep it looking better...
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Good. ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I like this page. I wish I could vote, but I'm not a registered user. [[User:69.92.237.2|69.92.237.2]] 17:55, 28 November 2006 (GMT) | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == ? ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Well, Ceorana, what can I do to improve it?
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ''Define "listy", please. Everyone keeps saying "listy", but if I don't know what it is, than I can't change it...''
| + | |
| − | :Turn some of the lists into paragraphs. A featured article should have lots of information, with minimal use of lists. Listing out some of the lists in paragraph form, with more details about each one, would be a great way to start. [[User:Ceorana|''C''eoran]]<sub>[[User talk:Ceorana|'''''<span style="color:red">t</span>''''']]</sub>[[User:Ceorana|a]] 02:01, 2 December 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
| − | ::''Thanks, Ceorana. I'll see what I can do.'' [[User:Asgarnieu|Asgarnieu]] 01:11, 4 December 2006 (GMT)
| + | |
So, what do the people who look at this page think? I would appreciate all comments, and critisism, constructive or not. Thank you.
