Difference between revisions of "Talk:Attican Empire"
From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Oglethorpia (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <h3 > {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (1/ | + | <h3 > {{PAGENAME}} FAC Vote (1/2/0) </h3 > |
''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ''Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.'' | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
| − | #[[User:Jbfballrb|Jbfballrb]] 21:46, 15 Apr 2005 (GMT)It is no better than any others, and there are two nation pages already featured, with 2(?) in consideration. | + | #[[User:Jbfballrb|Jbfballrb]] 21:46, 15 Apr 2005 (GMT) -- It is no better than any others, and there are two nation pages already featured, with 2(?) in consideration. |
| + | # [[User:Frisbeeteria|→ Fris]] [[User talk:Frisbeeteria|Θ<small>''talk''</small>]] 23:11, 6 May 2005 (GMT) -- Probably a good idea to identify a self-nomination, Antman. Too many red links, and links to common terms for my taste. Get some genuine history and remove (or cross-link to Wikipedia) the common words like Parliment, Duke, and Emporer, and it might eventually be worth renominating. | ||
| + | # [[User:Oglethorpia|Oglethorpia]] 02:07, 11 May 2005 (GMT) -- Can't say I see much more depth here than in other articles. Plus, the aforementioned mass of nonexistant pages that have been linked is also a detractor. | ||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
'''Comments/Questions''' | '''Comments/Questions''' | ||
| + | --[[User:Antman|Antman]] 05:06, 6 May 2005 (GMT) -- Isn't 'It is no better than any others' rather presumptious? I mean, the article(s) you wrote are terrible in structure, no offense. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:07, 10 May 2005
Attican Empire FAC Vote (1/2/0)
Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.
Support
- Antman 23:30, 3 Apr 2005 (GMT) -- It is an extremely well wrought page.
Oppose
- Jbfballrb 21:46, 15 Apr 2005 (GMT) -- It is no better than any others, and there are two nation pages already featured, with 2(?) in consideration.
- → Fris Θtalk 23:11, 6 May 2005 (GMT) -- Probably a good idea to identify a self-nomination, Antman. Too many red links, and links to common terms for my taste. Get some genuine history and remove (or cross-link to Wikipedia) the common words like Parliment, Duke, and Emporer, and it might eventually be worth renominating.
- Oglethorpia 02:07, 11 May 2005 (GMT) -- Can't say I see much more depth here than in other articles. Plus, the aforementioned mass of nonexistant pages that have been linked is also a detractor.
Neutral
Comments/Questions --Antman 05:06, 6 May 2005 (GMT) -- Isn't 'It is no better than any others' rather presumptious? I mean, the article(s) you wrote are terrible in structure, no offense.
