Difference between revisions of "Talk:British Londinium"
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Oh, I'd also like to throw out the example of [[Oceania (country)|Oceania]], which, in NS, is Azazia. So unless you make Oceania delete his page, I don't see why mine must be deleted. [[User:Eurasia|Eurasia]] 2133 hrs CST | Oh, I'd also like to throw out the example of [[Oceania (country)|Oceania]], which, in NS, is Azazia. So unless you make Oceania delete his page, I don't see why mine must be deleted. [[User:Eurasia|Eurasia]] 2133 hrs CST | ||
| − | I would | + | |
| + | I would like to dispute the naming of Oceania, or propose a modification of the naming conventions. [[User:John|John]] 03:40, 11 February 2007 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 23:40, 10 February 2007
Very nice article. I especially like the map. However Kensington Palace is not the PM's residence, but the Praetonian Embassy to Eurasia and still has a Praetonian armoured company in its grounds. Praetonia 19:20, 10 February 2007 (GMT)
Reply to Prætonia
So noted. I am aware of that fact, and I am referring to another palace - multiple palaces in the city, and they are easily renamed.
Title
What NS nation is this supposed to be? John 22:26, 10 February 2007 (GMT)
Title
British Londinium.
Why then do you not continue to edit British Londinium, rather than making this page? It does not make sense and will simply confuse anyone who reads this page. John 22:49, 10 February 2007 (GMT)
Because I don't RP as British Londinium - since this is a factbook, it ought to be made in the name of the country I RP as. Eurasia
Can you then please remove category:Nations if you are not going to associate this article with any NS nation? or make a nation in NS called "Eurasia"? John 23:05, 10 February 2007 (GMT)
It is based on an NS nation - British Londinium - I use all of its stats and stuff, but after RPed invasions and changes of government, there's a name change. I would make a nation called Eurasia, except for that whole "it's already been used" problem. Eurasia 23:07, 10 February 2007 (GMT)
Please see NSwiki:Naming Conventions
There is nothing in there about using the gameplay name, as there are other articles using RP names, like the article Zaire is about a nation that RPs with that name, the acrual user-name is Congo--Kinhasa. And besides, there is no need to use a stnadard infobox, so one can use a tale code in its place so that the page ling is to the nation page for "british londinium". Oh, and that also means I disagree with the speedy deletion of "Eurasia (nation)" --swilatia 01:08, 11 February 2007 (GMT)
I'm sorry, I didn't realize the phrase "In NSwiki, nation pages and region pages should be exactly the same as used in NationStates." could be misinterpreted. John 01:57, 11 February 2007 (GMT)
Oh, I'd also like to throw out the example of Oceania, which, in NS, is Azazia. So unless you make Oceania delete his page, I don't see why mine must be deleted. Eurasia 2133 hrs CST
I would like to dispute the naming of Oceania, or propose a modification of the naming conventions. John 03:40, 11 February 2007 (GMT)
