Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cold war"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
([Pudding])
([Pudding])
Line 1: Line 1:
 
You know... when adding a NPOV tag it would be nice if you would present some actual evidence~. I'll give you some time to prevent said evidence before I will remove the tag. [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]] 13:28, 9 Oct 2004 (GMT)
 
You know... when adding a NPOV tag it would be nice if you would present some actual evidence~. I'll give you some time to prevent said evidence before I will remove the tag. [[User:Knootoss|Knoot]] 13:28, 9 Oct 2004 (GMT)
  
== [Pudding] ==
+
== [[Pudding]] ==
  
 
It was you and M going it alone; GMC and L both publically disowned everything you were doing, and nothing was ever done under the auspice of SATO. I don't know why you're intent on dragging out a conflict that never ended because Jigoku disappeared, but I'd like to see your evidence that SATO did, in fact, support the rebels. Seeing as you are making the positive statement, the burden of proof is on those claiming something does exist. Lacking evidence, empiricism dictates that the purported fact is not.
 
It was you and M going it alone; GMC and L both publically disowned everything you were doing, and nothing was ever done under the auspice of SATO. I don't know why you're intent on dragging out a conflict that never ended because Jigoku disappeared, but I'd like to see your evidence that SATO did, in fact, support the rebels. Seeing as you are making the positive statement, the burden of proof is on those claiming something does exist. Lacking evidence, empiricism dictates that the purported fact is not.

Revision as of 09:54, 9 October 2004

You know... when adding a NPOV tag it would be nice if you would present some actual evidence~. I'll give you some time to prevent said evidence before I will remove the tag. Knoot 13:28, 9 Oct 2004 (GMT)

Pudding

It was you and M going it alone; GMC and L both publically disowned everything you were doing, and nothing was ever done under the auspice of SATO. I don't know why you're intent on dragging out a conflict that never ended because Jigoku disappeared, but I'd like to see your evidence that SATO did, in fact, support the rebels. Seeing as you are making the positive statement, the burden of proof is on those claiming something does exist. Lacking evidence, empiricism dictates that the purported fact is not.