Difference between revisions of "Talk:Economy"
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
"Struggling" is 3rd, not 5th. --[[User:Czardas|Czardas]] 24 July 2005 21:17 (GMT) | "Struggling" is 3rd, not 5th. --[[User:Czardas|Czardas]] 24 July 2005 21:17 (GMT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Nope. It's not. I've amended the rankings (as per earlier discussion with Gruenberg). | ||
+ | |||
+ | As an additional commentary, I tend to interpret the economy rating as a measure of economic ''growth'', not ''strength'', my reasoning being that the 'Fastest growing Economies' UN survey orders strictly by ranking in this category. I may have misinterpreted, of course. At any rate, my position isn't isolated; some of us who roleplay developing nations may have booming - perhaps Powerhouse - economies (think China in RL), but that doesn't make those economies ''strong'', or even sustainable. [[User:Ecopoeia|Ecopoeia]] 19:00, 24 November 2005 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 15:00, 24 November 2005
IMO these links you removed are hardly irrelevant. -- |Knoot|KNOOtalk 19:02, 18 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- I removed www.example.com and several headlines that only said "Headline Text." The link went nowhere important and the headlines did nothing useful. Northrop-Grumman 19:41, 18 Mar 2005 (GMT)
"Struggling" is 3rd, not 5th. --Czardas 24 July 2005 21:17 (GMT)
Nope. It's not. I've amended the rankings (as per earlier discussion with Gruenberg).
As an additional commentary, I tend to interpret the economy rating as a measure of economic growth, not strength, my reasoning being that the 'Fastest growing Economies' UN survey orders strictly by ranking in this category. I may have misinterpreted, of course. At any rate, my position isn't isolated; some of us who roleplay developing nations may have booming - perhaps Powerhouse - economies (think China in RL), but that doesn't make those economies strong, or even sustainable. Ecopoeia 19:00, 24 November 2005 (GMT)