Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eorpa"
Lord Eorpa (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | ''All Names and Places Mentioned in the Above Article are Copyright Thomas McDowall 2006'' | |
You can't copyright the content of an NSwiki article. See: [[NSwiki:Copyrights]]. [[User:Aridd|Aridd]] 22:03, 21 June 2006 (GMT) | You can't copyright the content of an NSwiki article. See: [[NSwiki:Copyrights]]. [[User:Aridd|Aridd]] 22:03, 21 June 2006 (GMT) | ||
− | I am the authors friend and I would just like to add (Undoubtedly he will add more when he sees this) that he only placed that copyright there because he may choose to use this information in a book at a later stage, and it was just to show that he held the respective rights for the creation of the contents. Of course I have read your link and understand why you said it should be removed, but that's just a little insight into why it was there. [[User:Lord Irashiru|Lord Irashiru]] 20:27, 22 June 2006 (GMT) | + | :I am the authors friend and I would just like to add (Undoubtedly he will add more when he sees this) that he only placed that copyright there because he may choose to use this information in a book at a later stage, and it was just to show that he held the respective rights for the creation of the contents. Of course I have read your link and understand why you said it should be removed, but that's just a little insight into why it was there. [[User:Lord Irashiru|Lord Irashiru]] 20:27, 22 June 2006 (GMT) |
− | Hello, I'd just quickly like to apologise for that, but in my article, I included information that I had developed for a book I am currently writing, and the last thing I wanted is someone to plagarise it, as I spent a long time coming up with it. I meant only to deter people from taking it as their own, but I fully appreciate that Copyrighting isn't allowed. [[User:Lord Eorpa|Lord Eorpa]] 14:20, 23 June 2006 (GMT) | + | ::Hello, I'd just quickly like to apologise for that, but in my article, I included information that I had developed for a book I am currently writing, and the last thing I wanted is someone to plagarise it, as I spent a long time coming up with it. I meant only to deter people from taking it as their own, but I fully appreciate that Copyrighting isn't allowed. [[User:Lord Eorpa|Lord Eorpa]] 14:20, 23 June 2006 (GMT) |
+ | |||
+ | That's fully understandable. I just wanted you to be aware that your copyright notice doesn't legally protect the contents of your article. Although I hope (and assume) no-one would actually plagiarise your work. [[User:Aridd|Aridd]] 12:59, 25 June 2006 (GMT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == New Version == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The new version is coming along nicely, although I only have one criticism, you link Irashiru too much, one link would have been enough :P If it is automatic, then fair enough, but if you are adding it in, don't bother, no need to have that many links on one page. [[User:Lord Irashiru|Lord Irashiru]] 23:26, 24 June 2006 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 08:59, 25 June 2006
All Names and Places Mentioned in the Above Article are Copyright Thomas McDowall 2006 You can't copyright the content of an NSwiki article. See: NSwiki:Copyrights. Aridd 22:03, 21 June 2006 (GMT)
- I am the authors friend and I would just like to add (Undoubtedly he will add more when he sees this) that he only placed that copyright there because he may choose to use this information in a book at a later stage, and it was just to show that he held the respective rights for the creation of the contents. Of course I have read your link and understand why you said it should be removed, but that's just a little insight into why it was there. Lord Irashiru 20:27, 22 June 2006 (GMT)
- Hello, I'd just quickly like to apologise for that, but in my article, I included information that I had developed for a book I am currently writing, and the last thing I wanted is someone to plagarise it, as I spent a long time coming up with it. I meant only to deter people from taking it as their own, but I fully appreciate that Copyrighting isn't allowed. Lord Eorpa 14:20, 23 June 2006 (GMT)
That's fully understandable. I just wanted you to be aware that your copyright notice doesn't legally protect the contents of your article. Although I hope (and assume) no-one would actually plagiarise your work. Aridd 12:59, 25 June 2006 (GMT)
New Version
The new version is coming along nicely, although I only have one criticism, you link Irashiru too much, one link would have been enough :P If it is automatic, then fair enough, but if you are adding it in, don't bother, no need to have that many links on one page. Lord Irashiru 23:26, 24 June 2006 (GMT)