Talk:FUA

"Security holes"?

Pfft.

I'm sure the fact that large chunks of it grossly violated the host's TOS had nothing to do with it...

It's more than just supposed security holes. It was shut down for gross violation of the TOS. Hell, they were warned about it by board members. I guess they didn't understand that having death threats in their "flame forum" wasn't the brightest of ideas. Furthermore, this whole article is playing the "poor me; I'm a martyr" card. Moderator abuse my ass. Not wanting to follow the rules is not the same as bias. Hack 04:43, 7 August 2006 (GMT)

Yeah, we were dumbshit fuckers for thinking we should have rights and not be deleted for having a different opinion than a mod, thus we created our own forum. dk3 even had their own flame forum, so why shouldn't we? Contrary to popular opinion, we never threatened each other's lives. If you call telling someone they're an idiot a death thread, well, now you can see how retarded the NS mods are. Am I going to be deleted for writing this? (gasp!) If so, you will have just proven me right. --Philopolis 21:37, 17 December 2006 (GMT)

Actually I don't remember all that much from FUA, but if there would have been any death threats than I am certain that I would have been able to remember that. I know that a few individuals didn't particularly get along and various insults were shared. However threats of death aren't something that I can remembering happening. So says the Almighty Crab, so says the ruler of us all. The Almighty Crab also says "Meow" Crabcake 00:39, 18 December 2006 (GMT)