Difference between revisions of "Talk:FUA"

From NSwiki, the NationStates encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
I'm sure the fact that large chunks of it grossly violated the host's TOS had nothing to do with it...
 
I'm sure the fact that large chunks of it grossly violated the host's TOS had nothing to do with it...
 +
<hr>
 +
It's more than just supposed security holes.  It <i>was</i> shut down for gross violation of the TOS.  Hell, they were warned about it by board members.  I guess they didn't understand that having death threats in their "flame forum" wasn't the brightest of ideas.  Furthermore, this whole article is playing the "poor me; I'm a  martyr" card.  Moderator abuse my ass.  Not wanting to follow the rules is not the same as bias. [[User:Hack|Hack]] 04:43, 7 August 2006 (GMT)

Revision as of 00:43, 7 August 2006

"Security holes"?

Pfft.

I'm sure the fact that large chunks of it grossly violated the host's TOS had nothing to do with it...


It's more than just supposed security holes. It was shut down for gross violation of the TOS. Hell, they were warned about it by board members. I guess they didn't understand that having death threats in their "flame forum" wasn't the brightest of ideas. Furthermore, this whole article is playing the "poor me; I'm a martyr" card. Moderator abuse my ass. Not wanting to follow the rules is not the same as bias. Hack 04:43, 7 August 2006 (GMT)