Difference between revisions of "Talk:First Battle of Mons Dei"

Revision as of 21:50, 2 January 2006

Please remember to sign your votes with 4 tildes ( ~~~~) and update the vote tally when you vote.

Support

A well written story that provides all the facts in a great read.HailandKill 04:20, 30 December 2005 (GMT)
An excellent edition towards the entire collection. If all other articles concerning the war are written with the same dedication I have little doubt that the entire 'War of Golden Sucession' will be nominated.

[[User:Sarcanza| [[User talk:Ceorana|

Oppose

Neutral

Not a bad article, but I find that it is a little hard to understand, especially the lead section. I'd like a little more background on the war in this article before I support this. → Ceo \ squawk 04:28, 30 December 2005 (GMT)

Comments/Questions

Understandable Ceo; I'll do my best to adress those concerns. Thanks also to Hailandkill; we were talking about the article and FAC issues, and I guess he decided to go for it! Macabees 04:58, 30 December 2005 (GMT)

This is a pretty well written article.

And I wish I hadn't ceased to exist so I could of participated... (Keyshona)

This was a good IC fight for me, and a damned good story if I say so myself. (Hailandkill)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 '''Support'''
 #A well written story that provides all the facts in a great read.[[User:HailandKill|HailandKill]] 04:20, 30 December 2005 (GMT)
 #An excellent edition towards the entire collection.  If all other articles concerning the war are written with the same dedication I have little doubt that the entire 'War of Golden Sucession' will be nominated.
+'''''[[User:Sarcanza| [[User talk:Ceorana|'''''
 '''Oppose'''